User talk:Amyharry: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== For a better wedding ==
Dear Amyharry,


Wedding date comes near at hand. Choosing wedding dresses has been submitted to schedule and also becomes a big tough task for me. My friends tell me the following three styles are fashion now. I have to made comparison among them.
Welcome to WikiIndex, where we discuss wiki and wiki ideas.


Simple Style：
I think everything you might possibly say is on topic on some wiki, although perhaps not this one.
and I wish you the best luck finding a wiki that discusses things you find interesting.


Simple design could build up to the special character of ladies. However how to emphasize on the merits and avoid demerits is a tough point with simple designs in the international fashion industry. The excellent pruning and material are the best points for success, which could embody the quality and class of wedding dresses perfectly. In my opinions, this style is fit for the girl who owns the strong sense of independence.   
When you copy text from someone else, such as
[http://www.blogstoday.co.uk/bloghome.aspx?username=TonyJustin TonyJustin]
or
[[Wikipedia: wedding dress]],
please tell where you got that text from.
Thank you.
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 20:23, 17 July 2009 (EDT)


Romantic Style:
If you carry on spamming we will block you. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 02:35, 25 July 2009 (EDT)
Maybe all of us would get to term of” romantic” for referred to wedding. And all of us make efforts to set up the natural and romantic mood.　The wedding gowns with hollowed bordering ornament or lovely clarity flowers, mysterious veils. All of these embody romantic style. It is fit for the girls who own the sense of cultural. And I love this very much. 
 
magnificence style：
 
None could deny that this style could make guys shining all of the time. But only magnificence is not enough, also include the elegant is perfect. It owns the French Royal style, embodies the glorious girls in prom dresses. But I don’t favor it very much for shinning so much.
 
Sorry, at first I thought you were a company selling wedding outfits.  Well we understand wikis here and we aren't fashion experts. All I can suggest is, perhaps you could discuss it with the lady of your dreams, would you rather spend a lot of money on a big wedding or would you rather keep money for setting up home together and all the expenses that you will have as a married couple? [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 13:42, 2 July 2009 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 06:35, 25 July 2009

Dear Amyharry,

Welcome to WikiIndex, where we discuss wiki and wiki ideas.

I think everything you might possibly say is on topic on some wiki, although perhaps not this one. and I wish you the best luck finding a wiki that discusses things you find interesting.

When you copy text from someone else, such as TonyJustin or Wikipedia: wedding dress, please tell where you got that text from. Thank you. --DavidCary 20:23, 17 July 2009 (EDT)

If you carry on spamming we will block you. Proxima Centauri 02:35, 25 July 2009 (EDT)

Retrieved from "https://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Amyharry&oldid=68123"