User talk:Spud Gun: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by EIassint (Talk); changed back to last version by Spud Gun)
No edit summary
Line 60: Line 60:


:I don't have time to trawl through these voluminous, and somewhat incoherent, discussions. What I do suggest is that you speak to the person who protected the aforementioned pages. That said, these discussions are probably best left on the discussion pages, rather than clutter up the article entries. All the best --[[User:Spud Gun | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Spud_Gun |talk]]) 05:56, 14 September 2009 (EDT)
:I don't have time to trawl through these voluminous, and somewhat incoherent, discussions. What I do suggest is that you speak to the person who protected the aforementioned pages. That said, these discussions are probably best left on the discussion pages, rather than clutter up the article entries. All the best --[[User:Spud Gun | <b><FONT COLOR="#8B3A3A">Carl McBride</FONT></b>]] ([[User_talk:Spud_Gun |talk]]) 05:56, 14 September 2009 (EDT)
ASSHOLE

Revision as of 23:52, 22 September 2010

Welcome! Please let me know if you need anything. peace, TedErnst | talk

name

If you're like to make a main namespace page for yourself, we can redirect your user page there and then redirect the talk page from there back here so you can still get messages. We really like it when people use their names here. :-) TedErnst | talk

You're very welcome. Happy to have you here, Carl. :-) TedErnst | talk

re: maths

I don't have any idea, actually. JohnStanton is the webmaster here. Maybe ask him? TedErnst | talk

Thanks

Thanks for the help in keeping the spam in check! — User:Sean Fennel@ 02:26, 31 August 2007 (EDT)

What do you think about external wikiindex entry points?

Hi Spud Gun,

please have a look on Proposal:WikiIndex Pages on indexed Wikis --Wolf | talk 07:03, 3 October 2007 (EDT)

Sssssss... Get out of bed! {scares Spud out of bed} --Snuffleupagus 12:36, 5 August 2008 (EDT)

Image size

Yeah, I noticed that the transparency went away. I wasn't sure if that was just me, but now I see that it's not. Sorry about that. We can revert the change. I was just trying to make it fit into the box better. Best, MarvelZuvembie 14:06, 10 October 2008 (EDT)

OK, I reverted it. I'd say that I have intermediate wiki skills, but I'm not advanced enough to know how to keep the arrow on the "Recent Changes" link from encroaching the border of the infobox. How do you keep the margins intact? --MarvelZuvembie 14:11, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
I have now uploaded the new SklogWiki logo. All should now be in order. All the best -- Carl McBride (talk) 11:02, 3 November 2008 (EST)

Ping

Well, happy with wF? --Wolf | talk 17:58, 26 March 2009 (EDT)

Very! Many thanks for all the work you have put into this! All the best -- Carl McBride (talk) 07:07, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
That's fine! :-)
There is a short discussion about the position of wikiFactor in the template. Do you want to join? I'll make first graphs the next days (such as size ~ wF or views ~ wF) --Wolf | talk 07:53, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
Here's another link: Articles having wF info --Wolf | talk 07:56, 27 March 2009 (EDT)

User:Jonah Musto

User:Jonah Musto is bolocked blocked, thanks for helping. Proxima Centauri 14:41, 19 August 2009 (EDT)

Dispute Resolution

Hey Carl, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is here ~~ MarkDilley

Thanks man

Noticed you have been doing a lot of helpful work around here. Lumenos 03:00, 10 September 2009 (EDT)

About that "dispute resolution"...

Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):

Talk:RationalWiki#Vote_for_re-insertion

Talk:A_Storehouse_of_Knowledge#Vote_for_re-insertion

Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote_for_re-insertion

Talk:Liberapedia#Vote_for_re-insertion

I don't have time to trawl through these voluminous, and somewhat incoherent, discussions. What I do suggest is that you speak to the person who protected the aforementioned pages. That said, these discussions are probably best left on the discussion pages, rather than clutter up the article entries. All the best -- Carl McBride (talk) 05:56, 14 September 2009 (EDT)

ASSHOLE