Category talk:Imposters: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(Proactivity is good) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we proactively block all accounts, of active people here, that fit the doppelganger pattern? ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | Should we proactively block all accounts, of active people here, that fit the doppelganger pattern? ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
:If you're talking about users with names like EIassint or MarkDiIley then yes, they are deliberately trying to cause disruption by pretending to be admins. I'm not sure who else might fit the "doppelganger pattern" '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 09 24 2010 | :If you're talking about users with names like EIassint or MarkDiIley then yes, they are deliberately trying to cause disruption by pretending to be admins. I'm not sure who else might fit the "doppelganger pattern" '''[[User talk:Elassint|Elassint]]''', 09 24 2010 | ||
::That seems reasonable to me. I used to do that on a different site (non-wiki) as we had a similar problem. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 18:06, 24 September 2010 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:06, 25 September 2010
Should we proactively block all accounts, of active people here, that fit the doppelganger pattern? ~~ MarkDilley
- If you're talking about users with names like EIassint or MarkDiIley then yes, they are deliberately trying to cause disruption by pretending to be admins. I'm not sure who else might fit the "doppelganger pattern" Elassint, 09 24 2010
- That seems reasonable to me. I used to do that on a different site (non-wiki) as we had a similar problem. --MarvelZuvembie 18:06, 24 September 2010 (PDT)