User talk:TeraS: Difference between revisions
(With your help, I hope that someday we will have a good blocking policy) |
|||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
but also explains why. | but also explains why. | ||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:53, 25 September 2011 (PDT) | --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:53, 25 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
:::Always happy to help David... I commented as asked, but in short I do not see why blatant spammers deserve a second chance ever. [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 10:22, 25 September 2011 (PDT) |
Revision as of 17:22, 25 September 2011
Hello and a belated Welcome to WikiIndex. Best, MarkDilley
<huggles>
Thank you for the welcome!
Incubus
I've actually seen Incubus (which is much easier to obtain now thanks to Netflix). Even though it's Shatner, his cadence isn't nearly as annoying in Esperanto as it is in English. --MarvelZuvembie 19:50, 18 May 2009 (EDT)
It's actually one of the movies on my Wiki but there are other much better movies out there on succubi or incubi...
Your thoughts on upgrade and logo
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - WikiIndex:Admin_Notes#October_2010_Upgrade_Thoughts - best, MarkDilley
Blocking Spammers
No worries! We fight side by side against spammers :-) Raymond King | talk
Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all
Please check out WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision and WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path, Best, MarkDilley
grrrr
n00b grrrrrrrrr .....--Comets 04:59, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
- Tera - I think you are doing great, despite this unconstructive message. Mistakes are part of life :-) Best, MarkDilley
- This was the only wiki where i was not mistakenly blocked by a n00b admin ....well uptil now :(..--Comets 15:58, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
Thanks!
Thanks for cleaning up my talk page. I wonder what that was all about. --MarvelZuvembie 13:14, 18 August 2011 (PDT)
- Welcome! TeraS 16:19, 18 August 2011 (PDT)
Also, thanks for catching the spammers! --MarvelZuvembie 16:07, 6 September 2011 (PDT)
- I was amazed at just how many there were this morning... yeesh!! TeraS 16:17, 6 September 2011 (PDT)
Thank you for reverting tons of spam and blocking spammers. I see you have been blocking spammers "with an expiry time of infinite". Would you mind joining the discussion on the appropriate length of time for the first few blocks at WikiIndex talk: Blocking Policy? I currently think that it would be better overall to use much shorter blocks, at least for the first offense or two, but perhaps you have a very good reason for infinite blocks. (I discuss some reasons for shorter blocks on that talk page and at User talk:Proxima Centauri#User:Jonah Musto). With your help, I hope that someday we will have a good blocking policy that not only clearly states what the policy is, but also explains why. --DavidCary 08:53, 25 September 2011 (PDT)
- Always happy to help David... I commented as asked, but in short I do not see why blatant spammers deserve a second chance ever. TeraS 10:22, 25 September 2011 (PDT)