1,320
edits
User talk:TeraS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
With your help, I hope that someday we will have a good blocking policy
(With your help, I hope that someday we will have a good blocking policy) |
|||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
Also, thanks for catching the spammers! --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:07, 6 September 2011 (PDT) | Also, thanks for catching the spammers! --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 16:07, 6 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
::I was amazed at just how many there were this morning... yeesh!! [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 16:17, 6 September 2011 (PDT) | ::I was amazed at just how many there were this morning... yeesh!! [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 16:17, 6 September 2011 (PDT) | ||
Thank you for reverting tons of spam and blocking spammers. | |||
I see you have been blocking spammers "with an expiry time of infinite". | |||
Would you mind joining the discussion on the appropriate length of time for the first few blocks at | |||
[[WikiIndex talk: Blocking Policy]]? | |||
I currently think that it would be better overall to use much shorter blocks, at least for the first offense or two, | |||
but perhaps you have a very good reason for infinite blocks. | |||
(I discuss some reasons for shorter blocks on that talk page and at [[User talk:Proxima Centauri#User:Jonah Musto]]). | |||
With your help, I hope that someday we will have a good blocking policy that not only clearly states what the policy is, | |||
but also explains why. | |||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:53, 25 September 2011 (PDT) | |||