Template talk:Wiki status: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (:: Dead, maybe the action for dead wiki is to make the template inactive, not really needing inactive as a stage... not sure, will ponder, look forward to your thoughts on it. Best, ~~~) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (Dead vs Inactive) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
: um, wow, nice work!! ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | : um, wow, nice work!! ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
::Thank-you :) Are there any other languages which need to be added, or any other amendments? --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 03:37, 3 January 2012 (PST) | ::Thank-you :) Are there any other languages which need to be added, or any other amendments? --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 03:37, 3 January 2012 (PST) | ||
==Dead vs Inactive== | |||
Dead, maybe the action for dead wiki is to make the template inactive, not really needing inactive as a stage... not sure, will ponder, look forward to your thoughts on it. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
:Aha - I didn't want to make any drastic changes – but yes, I agree, we have un-necessary duplication. [[:Category:Dead]] currently has 270 articles, and [[:Category:Inactive]] currently has 860 articles. I would personally prefer that the Dead category be kept; as Inactive has the potential to be confused with [[:Category:Dormant]]. In terms of templates, we currently have both [[Template:Wiki dead]] and [[Template:Inactive]] – 'Wiki dead' renders a page better than 'Inactive' – the least preferred one can be redirected to the other. Which ever way you wish to proceed with the 1000+ affected articles, you'll need to create a [[:Category:User Bot|bot account]] to process all the changes :p --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 12:16, 8 January 2012 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 20:16, 8 January 2012
Edit history
This template was created from the existing table at Category:Wiki Status. For its edit history, please see here. --Hoof Hearted 13:58, 2 January 2012 (PST)
- um, wow, nice work!! ~~ MarkDilley
- Thank-you :) Are there any other languages which need to be added, or any other amendments? --Hoof Hearted 03:37, 3 January 2012 (PST)
Dead vs Inactive
Dead, maybe the action for dead wiki is to make the template inactive, not really needing inactive as a stage... not sure, will ponder, look forward to your thoughts on it. Best, MarkDilley
- Aha - I didn't want to make any drastic changes – but yes, I agree, we have un-necessary duplication. Category:Dead currently has 270 articles, and Category:Inactive currently has 860 articles. I would personally prefer that the Dead category be kept; as Inactive has the potential to be confused with Category:Dormant. In terms of templates, we currently have both Template:Wiki dead and Template:Inactive – 'Wiki dead' renders a page better than 'Inactive' – the least preferred one can be redirected to the other. Which ever way you wish to proceed with the 1000+ affected articles, you'll need to create a bot account to process all the changes :p --Hoof Hearted 12:16, 8 January 2012 (PST)