Category talk:Dormant: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(inactive template)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''Some conversations here were moved from Category talk:Inactive and preserved for history's sake''
==Untitled==
[[:Category:All]] should not list Inactive, me thinks, need to figure out a work around. Best, [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
[[:Category:All]] should not list Inactive, me thinks, need to figure out a work around. Best, [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]


Line 6: Line 8:


Just found out that changing the name of the template to Inactive is all that's needed.  The other information doens't need to be removed! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:46, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
Just found out that changing the name of the template to Inactive is all that's needed.  The other information doens't need to be removed! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:46, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
== definition? ==
Do we need to re-visit the definition of Inactive?  Do we need to add another category Offline, or something like that? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 16:26, 17 May 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 05:09, 13 February 2017

Some conversations here were moved from Category talk:Inactive and preserved for history's sake

Untitled[edit]

Category:All should not list Inactive, me thinks, need to figure out a work around. Best, MarkDilley

You're idea of using an Inactive template put in place and working well! --Raymond King | talk 20:14, 14 Feb 2006 (EST)

inactive template[edit]

Just found out that changing the name of the template to Inactive is all that's needed. The other information doens't need to be removed! TedErnst | talk 12:46, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)

definition?[edit]

Do we need to re-visit the definition of Inactive? Do we need to add another category Offline, or something like that? TedErnst | talk 16:26, 17 May 2006 (EDT)