User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Who's Online?: takes less space) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{TOC right}} | ||
==Who's Online? == | ==Who's Online?== | ||
{| class= | {|class=wikitable | ||
! Stats !! last 16 [[Special:WhosOnline|Users | !Stats!!last 16 [[Special:WhosOnline|Page Views by LoggedIn Users]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
| You are logged in as:<br> | |You are logged in as:<br> | ||
'''{{CURRENTUSER}}''' | '''{{CURRENTUSER}}''' | ||
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} | *Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} | *Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} | ||
*Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}} | *Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}} | ||
||{{:Special:WhosOnline/16}} | |||
|| {{:Special:WhosOnline/16}} | |||
|} | |} | ||
Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 20: | ||
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win! | Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win! | ||
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST) | We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki (en)]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST) | ||
==block length== | ==block length== | ||
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this [[WikiIndex]] a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking | Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this [[WikiIndex]] a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy]] ? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
==Dispute resolution== | ==Dispute resolution== | ||
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [ | Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [https://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | ||
==About that "dispute resolution"...== | ==About that "dispute resolution"...== | ||
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages): | Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages): | ||
*[[Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||
*[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]] | *[[Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia)#Vote for re-insertion]] | ||
[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
[[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
==Hi Comets,== | ==Hi Comets,== | ||
| Line 50: | Line 43: | ||
==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all== | ==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all== | ||
Please check out [[WikiIndex: | Please check out [[WikiIndex:New logo decision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
==Yes I'm all thumbs== | ==Yes I'm all thumbs== | ||
| Line 58: | Line 51: | ||
It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
==narrowing down the problem with email verification== | |||
I (Manorainjan ;-) assume, that Your account is email-verified. Please add the domain part of Your email to this [[Category talk:Active administrators of this wiki#Table of results|Table of results]] so that we can see more clearly, which servers work and which not. | |||
== | ==Request for [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] concerns == | ||
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to the upcoming [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] and solicit your help in making the transition a positive rather than negative experience. Please take a moment to visit [[WikiIndex:ServerMove|ServerMove]] and curate the list of concerns. Thanks! -- [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 22:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC) (call forwarded by [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 23:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC)) | |||
I | ==Weigh in on [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change#Poll]]?== | ||
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to a potential [[WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change|decision to change the domain of this wiki]]. I hope you'll weigh in with your opinion. Thanks! [[User:BrandonCsSanders|BrandonCsSanders]] ([[User talk:BrandonCsSanders|talk]]) 20:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
[[ | |||
Latest revision as of 00:23, 22 January 2023
Who's Online?[edit]
| Stats | last 16 Page Views by LoggedIn Users |
|---|---|
| You are logged in as: 172.71.191.21
|
There are no results for this report. |
Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let John Stanton know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, MarkDilley
- Np :) ..--Comets 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
Request for neutral admin[edit]
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of Conservapedia, RationalWiki (en), and The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, JazzMan 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
block length[edit]
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this WikiIndex a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at WikiIndex:Blocking and banning policy ? --DavidCary 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
Dispute resolution[edit]
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is here ~~ MarkDilley
About that "dispute resolution"...[edit]
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
- Talk:RationalWiki (en)#Vote for re-insertion
- Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion
- Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion
- Talk:Liberapedia (Wikia)#Vote for re-insertion
Hi Comets,[edit]
I recreated ;-) the page Christopedia in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and {{add}}. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --Wolf | talk 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)
- oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--Comets 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)
Your thoughts on upgrade and logo[edit]
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts - best, MarkDilley
Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all[edit]
Please check out WikiIndex:New logo decision and WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path, Best, MarkDilley
Yes I'm all thumbs[edit]
I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again TeraS 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
Why so rough?[edit]
It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, MarkDilley
narrowing down the problem with email verification[edit]
I (Manorainjan ;-) assume, that Your account is email-verified. Please add the domain part of Your email to this Table of results so that we can see more clearly, which servers work and which not.
Request for ServerMove concerns[edit]
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to the upcoming ServerMove and solicit your help in making the transition a positive rather than negative experience. Please take a moment to visit ServerMove and curate the list of concerns. Thanks! -- BrandonCsSanders (talk) 22:38, 14 November 2014 (UTC) (call forwarded by Manorainjan (talk) 23:12, 14 November 2014 (UTC))
Weigh in on WikiIndex:Proposal: domain name change#Poll?[edit]
I wanted to be sure to draw your attention to a potential decision to change the domain of this wiki. I hope you'll weigh in with your opinion. Thanks! BrandonCsSanders (talk) 20:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)