Welcome to WikiIndex — the 'wiki index' of all wikis, wiki people, wiki software, wiki farms, and wiki ideas.
Please add your wiki, and join our community. Note: WikiIndex is not a wiki hosting service.

(please log-in to bypass the anti-spam Captcha and remove this heading notice)

Abd Lomax: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (Reverted edits by Cocopuff2018 (talk) to last revision by Hoof Hearted)
Tag: Rollback
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I am a a long-term student of [[:Category:Consensus|consensus process]], and anticipated much of the wiki movement.  However, the 800 lb gorilla, the [[English Wikipedia]], was naive about consensus process and the community did not realize that it is far from 'quick'.  That is, the basic operation of the [[wiki]] could indeed be quick, ad hoc, and it was not surprising that this worked as well as it did.  However, for the project to be NPOV (express a neutral point of view), genuine consensus process was needed.  Outside of narrow circumstances where high consensus is relatively natural, this requires deep discussion and often skilled facilitation.
{{Personal infobox <!--see 'Template:Personal infobox' for full detail-->
|image      = https://upload.Wikimedia.org/wikiversity/en/thumb/3/3e/WIN_20150603_210114.JPG/320px-WIN_20150603_210114.JPG
|name      = Abd ul-Rahman Lomax<!--full OFFICIAL name of person-->
|age        = Born 1944,<sup>[http://ColdFusionCommunity.net/biography-abd-ul-rahman-lomax/]</sup> Grandfather (of six)<sup>([[WikiIndex talk:Prohibited content#Controversial sites|ref]])</sup>
|gender    = {{tag|Male wiki people|Male}}
|other names= Abd, Abd Lomax,<br>''born:'' Dennis George Lomax<!--wiki username(s), other nickname(s); leave blank if none/unknown-->
|nationality= {{tag|Wiki people from the United States|American}}
|languages  = {{Language|en|N}}<!--eg: English, Spanish, Japanese etc; ideally tag with babels, eg: {{Language|fi|N}}{{Language|en|3}}-->
|residence  = {{tag|United States of America}}<!--city, state, country; tag first available-->
|home wiki  = [[English Wikiversity]] <small>(indefinitely banned)</small><!--wikilink to WikiIndex article(s); leave blank if unknown-->
|status    = Active <small>(community-banned on [[English Wikipedia]])</small><!--'Active', 'Semi-active', 'WikiHoliday', 'Retired', 'Deceased', etc-->
|website    = http://ColdFusionCommunity.net<!--eg: http://PersonalURL.org - leave blank if none/unknown-->
|contacts  = {{Nospam|name|Gmail.com}}<!--e-mail (anti-spam e-mail), Skype, IRC, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, etc; only if ALREADY in public domain; leave blank if none / unknown-->
}}
'''Abd ul-Rahman Lomax''' (''born:'' '''Dennis George Lomax''', 1944),<ref>[[Archive.org:20210223171854/http://ColdFusionCommunity.net/w/index.php/User_talk:Abd|User talk:Abd]]; ''ColdFusionCommunity.net'' (via [[Archive.org]]); [[CFC wiki]]; archived 23 February 2021.</ref> who edits under the [[username]] '''Abd''', is a [[Wikimedia Meta-Wiki|Meta-Wikipedian]], [[English Wikiversity|Wikiversity]] user, and cold fusion expert, with interests in Landmark Education programs.  It has been stated that "On vortex, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax is responsible [for] the best summary about the history of LENR, analysis of scientific community behavior.[http://www.lenr-forum.com/showthread.php?764-LENR-history-by-Abd-Ul-Rahman-lomax]  A thorough lampooning of his style appeared on [[RationalWikiWiki]].[http://en.rationalwikiwikiwiki.org/wiki/Abd]
 
More specifically, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax is a long-term student of [[:Category:Consensus|consensus]] process, and anticipated much of the [[Wikisphere|wiki movement]].  However, the 800&nbsp;lb gorilla, the [[English Wikipedia]], was naive about consensus process and the community did not realize that it is far from 'quick'.  That is, the basic operation of the [[wiki]] could indeed be quick, ad hoc, and it was not surprising that this worked as well as it did.  However, for the project to be [[:Category:NPOV|NPOV]] (express a neutral point of view), genuine consensus process was needed.  Outside of narrow circumstances where high consensus is relatively natural, this requires deep discussion and often skilled facilitation.


So Wikipedia failed to be neutral.  It has ideals of neutrality, and often meets them, but never became reliable, because of a lack of structure that would make this happen.
So Wikipedia failed to be neutral.  It has ideals of neutrality, and often meets them, but never became reliable, because of a lack of structure that would make this happen.


As a Wikipedian, first editing in 2005, I eventually came across an abusive [[blacklist]]ing of a web site that is a library of permitted copies of published on cold fusion, lenr-canr.org.  I confronted this entirely on process grounds, my opinion about cold fusion at that time was the standard one: fascinating discovery, announced in 1989, that was unfortunately unconfirmed.  I was wrong, very wrong, on that.  However, the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee confirmed my complaint, and then I discovered how totally useless this was.  They reprimanded the [[Sysop|administrator]], who then proceeded to retaliate in every way possible, and his friends did, as well.
As a [[Wikipedian]], first editing in [[:Category:Founded in 2005|2005]], I eventually came across an abusive [[blacklist]]ing of a website that is a library of permitted copies of published on cold fusion, [http://LENR-CANR.org LENR-CANR.org].  I confronted this entirely on process grounds, my opinion about cold fusion at that time was the standard one: fascinating discovery, announced in 1989, that was unfortunately unconfirmed.  I was wrong, very wrong, on that.  However, the [[Wikipedia Arbitration Committee]] confirmed my complaint, and then I discovered how totally useless this was.  They reprimanded the [[Sysop|administrator]], who then proceeded to retaliate in every way possible, and his friends did, as well.
 
Wikipedia is vulnerable to '''factional editing''' and administration.  It is not a violation of policy.  It can be difficult to detect, it takes research and objective analysis to do this.  And that takes a lot of time, and nobody has the time.  If someone does the research — I did — the community will assume that someone who is crazy enough to put in that much time and effort *must be* a [[:Category:Point of view|POV]]-pusher.


Wikipedia is vulnerable to factional editing and administrationIt is not a violation of policyIt can be difficult to detect, it takes research and objective analysis to do thisAnd that takes a lot of time, and nobody has the timeIf someone does the research -- I did -- the community will assume that someone who is crazy enough to put in that much time and effort *must be* a POV-pusher.
And so it goesMy home wiki was [[English Wikiversity]], active for a long time, and where I had been [[sysop]] a number of timesBecause [[:Category:Wikiversity|Wikiversity]] allows, and allows sub-pages in mainspace, and implements neutrality inclusively instead of exclusively, there is little content conflict on Wikiversity, and [[:Category:Education|educational]] resources may be developed there with high depth, while maintaining overall neutrality (if the maintainers of the resource care to make it so, and we know how to do it).  However, I am currently indefinitely [[blocked]] on WikiversityI am recovering all content that was abruptly deleted out-of-process, but I had previously stopped creating educational resources on Wikiversity, having concluded it was not a safe place to work.  That proved to be accurate.  I'm in the process of documenting what happened.  I have a new wiki, being used to hold deleted Wikiversity content (hundreds of pages), [[CFC wiki]] [[Archive.org:20210223171939/http://ColdFusionCommunity.net/w/index.php/Main_Page|here]], in addition to a blog, [http://ColdFusionCommunity.net], where what I'm finding in my research is published.  It's quite a mess.


And so it goes. My home wiki is now [[English Wikiversity|Wikiversity]], where I am active, and where I have been [[sysop]] a number of times. Because Wikiversity allows, and allows subpages in mainspace, and implements neutrality inclusively instead of exclusively, there is little content conflict on Wikiversity, and educational resources may be developed there with high depth, while maintaining overall neutrality (if the maintainers of the resource care to make it so, and we know how to do it).
The description above on Wikiversity is no longer true. A bureaucrat has unilaterally declared that "fringe science" cannot be studied without prior approval of a review board that never existed.


[[Category:AccountUsed2014]]
;''References
[[Category:AccountUsed2015]]
<References/>


{{language|en|N}}
[[Category:Account used in 2014]]
[[Category:Account used in 2015]]

Latest revision as of 10:03, 23 December 2024

https://upload.Wikimedia.org/wikiversity/en/thumb/3/3e/WIN_20150603_210114.JPG/320px-WIN_20150603_210114.JPG
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Age: Born 1944,[1] Grandfather (of six)(ref)
Gender: Male
Other names: Abd, Abd Lomax,
born: Dennis George Lomax
Nationality: American
Language(s):
en-N This person is a native English speaker.
Residence: United States of America
Home wiki(s): English Wikiversity (indefinitely banned)
Editing status: Active (community-banned on English Wikipedia)
Pers. website: http://ColdFusionCommunity.net
Contact(s): name{[at]}Gmail.com

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax (born: Dennis George Lomax, 1944),[1] who edits under the username Abd, is a Meta-Wikipedian, Wikiversity user, and cold fusion expert, with interests in Landmark Education programs. It has been stated that "On vortex, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax is responsible [for] the best summary about the history of LENR, analysis of scientific community behavior.[2] A thorough lampooning of his style appeared on RationalWikiWiki.[3]

More specifically, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax is a long-term student of consensus process, and anticipated much of the wiki movement. However, the 800 lb gorilla, the English Wikipedia, was naive about consensus process and the community did not realize that it is far from 'quick'. That is, the basic operation of the wiki could indeed be quick, ad hoc, and it was not surprising that this worked as well as it did. However, for the project to be NPOV (express a neutral point of view), genuine consensus process was needed. Outside of narrow circumstances where high consensus is relatively natural, this requires deep discussion and often skilled facilitation.

So Wikipedia failed to be neutral. It has ideals of neutrality, and often meets them, but never became reliable, because of a lack of structure that would make this happen.

As a Wikipedian, first editing in 2005, I eventually came across an abusive blacklisting of a website that is a library of permitted copies of published on cold fusion, LENR-CANR.org. I confronted this entirely on process grounds, my opinion about cold fusion at that time was the standard one: fascinating discovery, announced in 1989, that was unfortunately unconfirmed. I was wrong, very wrong, on that. However, the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee confirmed my complaint, and then I discovered how totally useless this was. They reprimanded the administrator, who then proceeded to retaliate in every way possible, and his friends did, as well.

Wikipedia is vulnerable to factional editing and administration. It is not a violation of policy. It can be difficult to detect, it takes research and objective analysis to do this. And that takes a lot of time, and nobody has the time. If someone does the research — I did — the community will assume that someone who is crazy enough to put in that much time and effort *must be* a POV-pusher.

And so it goes. My home wiki was English Wikiversity, active for a long time, and where I had been sysop a number of times. Because Wikiversity allows, and allows sub-pages in mainspace, and implements neutrality inclusively instead of exclusively, there is little content conflict on Wikiversity, and educational resources may be developed there with high depth, while maintaining overall neutrality (if the maintainers of the resource care to make it so, and we know how to do it). However, I am currently indefinitely blocked on Wikiversity. I am recovering all content that was abruptly deleted out-of-process, but I had previously stopped creating educational resources on Wikiversity, having concluded it was not a safe place to work. That proved to be accurate. I'm in the process of documenting what happened. I have a new wiki, being used to hold deleted Wikiversity content (hundreds of pages), CFC wiki here, in addition to a blog, [4], where what I'm finding in my research is published. It's quite a mess.

The description above on Wikiversity is no longer true. A bureaucrat has unilaterally declared that "fringe science" cannot be studied without prior approval of a review board that never existed.

References
  1. User talk:Abd; ColdFusionCommunity.net (via Archive.org); CFC wiki; archived 23 February 2021.