Anonymity: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(not a 'WikiIdea' because anon was used on BBS, Usenet, forums, etc before wiki)
m (Text replacement - "Category:WikiConcept" to "Category:Wiki concept")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Anonymity''' is a [[wiki]]-norm that enables free speech (by reducing the potential for real-world consequences) and discourages ad hominem attacks (by making it harder to link an on-[[WhatIsWiki|wiki]] identity to a user's off-wiki affiliations, interests, etc., and use that information to accuse them of conflicts of interests with regard to his on-wiki contributions).  It also can enable [[user]]s to get a fresh start, which is sometimes good and sometimes bad, depending on whether he uses his new identity for good or bad purposes.
'''Anonymity''' is a fundamental [[wiki]]-norm that enables free speech (by reducing the potential for real-world consequences) and discourages ad hominem attacks (by making it harder to link an on-[[WhatIsWiki|wiki]] identity to a user's off-wiki affiliations, interests, etc., and use that information to accuse them of conflicts of interests with regard to their on-wiki contributions).  It can also enable [[user]]s to get a fresh start; which is sometimes good and sometimes bad, depending on whether they use their new identity for good or bad purposes.


Wikis such as [[Citizendium]] that insisted on users' verifiability using their [[WikiIndex:RealNames|real names]] typically have not done well.  However, even Wikimedia [[meta-wiki:Identification noticeboard/header|demands]] that certain users, e.g. [[check user]], [[oversight]], [[steward]], [[ombudsman]], and [[Wikimedia Board|Wikimedia Board of Trustees]], provide proof of identity.
Wikis such as [[Citizendium]] that insisted on users' verifiability using their [[WikiIndex:Real names|real names]] typically have not faired well.  However, even the mighty [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] (WMF) [[Meta-Wiki:Identification noticeboard/header|demands]] that certain specific users provide proof of identity; these include: [[check user]], [[oversight]], [[steward]], [[ombudsman]], and [[Wikimedia Board|Wikimedia Board of Trustees]].


;See also
;''See also
*[[IP address]]
*[[IP address]]
**[[IP editor]]
*[[IP editor]]
*[[Pseudonym]]
*[[Pseudonym]]
*[[Proposal:RealNames]]
*[[Proposal:RealNames]]
*[[WikiProject:PrivacyLevels]]
*[[WikiIndex:Privacy policy]]


[[Category:Glossary]]
[[Category:Glossary]]
[[Category:WikiConcept]]
[[Category:Wiki concept]]

Latest revision as of 13:50, 4 November 2022

Anonymity is a fundamental wiki-norm that enables free speech (by reducing the potential for real-world consequences) and discourages ad hominem attacks (by making it harder to link an on-wiki identity to a user's off-wiki affiliations, interests, etc., and use that information to accuse them of conflicts of interests with regard to their on-wiki contributions). It can also enable users to get a fresh start; which is sometimes good and sometimes bad, depending on whether they use their new identity for good or bad purposes.

Wikis such as Citizendium that insisted on users' verifiability using their real names typically have not faired well. However, even the mighty Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) demands that certain specific users provide proof of identity; these include: check user, oversight, steward, ombudsman, and Wikimedia Board of Trustees.

See also