Talk:Skipper2Skipper sailing wiki: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(vibrant?)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
How can it be vibrant with so new and so few articles? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 18:02, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
How can it be vibrant with so new and so few articles? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 18:02, 27 October 2006 (EDT)
: Yes that was my question too, but I looked up "[[:category:Vibrant|Vibrant]]" and I read that vibrant is... something special and (...without looking on my own edits...) this wiki seems to become (probably) very active, look at my comment, they drive a 1.8.2 [[MediaWiki]], they must be only a few days old (I, personally, will change the "vibrant" to "active" in a few days, if they aren't so vibrant as it seems to be for me today). Maybe I as a newby think of a discovery, while you think of it as it was just a flash in the pan... --[[Wolf Peuker|Peu]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 18:30, 27 October 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 22:30, 27 October 2006

How can it be vibrant with so new and so few articles? TedErnst | talk 18:02, 27 October 2006 (EDT)

Yes that was my question too, but I looked up "Vibrant" and I read that vibrant is... something special and (...without looking on my own edits...) this wiki seems to become (probably) very active, look at my comment, they drive a 1.8.2 MediaWiki, they must be only a few days old (I, personally, will change the "vibrant" to "active" in a few days, if they aren't so vibrant as it seems to be for me today). Maybe I as a newby think of a discovery, while you think of it as it was just a flash in the pan... --Peu | talk 18:30, 27 October 2006 (EDT)