|
|
| (14 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ==Proposal: 28-Jan-2006: Coding comments for more transparent clarity==
| |
| * More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves. I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
| |
| ** I agree and will try to do this --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 20:49, 17 Feb 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Proposal: 29-Jan-2006: New categories production==
| |
| * We make the actual new cateogies after x time or x wiki fall into that category, pre-launch. [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
| |
| ** Additional Categories. I found that if you add an additional category to a page (see CodeBook and AddYourOwn) you must also add the category command somewhere on the page so that it also categorized the article properly. I am concerned that this will be confusing to users, so for now, I am using this format to at least keep it all in one place: --[[User:Rathbone|Ray]] 17:04, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
| |
| *** Ray, I know what you mean about the proper way to create new categories, but I'm not sure what you're saying about "this format." Can you clarify, please? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:02, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Proposal: 13-Feb-2006: Authentic language categories ==
| |
| * see [[:Category:Spanish]] discussion for more info/example.
| |
|
| |
| ==Proposal: 14-Feb-2006: Structured data ==
| |
| * What would the definition be for [[StructuredData]]
| |
| ** I don't know what this is (and yes, I've read the page). [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:01, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
| |
| : Trying to clarify that because this site uses structured data, some things are done a little differently than other wiki. (wikipedia, meatball, etc). I think Structured Data is new to the wiki family, it is to me, so being clear about it will help.
| |
| :: I still don't understand. How is this different from Meatball or Wikipedia? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 00:11, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
| |
|
| |
| ==Proposal: 17-Feb-2006: Tag and category use==
| |
| * Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or as a bulleted list, whatever the editor wishes, using the tag template.
| |
|
| |
| :: example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit§ion=1
| |
|
| |
| * Categories would be used as media wiki currently understands them for the footer grouping. They would be placed above the template code for two reasons:
| |
| # cleaner for the site/newbies
| |
| # put them infront of template categories in the footer section, to highlight them.
| |
|
| |
| :: example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit
| |
|
| |
| Please indicate your approval (or not) here:
| |
| * '''yes''' [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:53, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
| |
| * '''yes''' [[Christophe Ducamp]] | <small>[[User talk:ChristopheDucamp|talk]]</small> 11:55, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
| |