User talk:GetSmartFan44: Difference between revisions
(New page: Conservapedia has been the subject of arguments. There seems to be a compromise that users need information about how to avoid getting blocked there. Seeing a ban window unexpectedly...) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Conservapedia]] has been the subject of arguments. There seems to be a compromise that users need information about how to avoid getting blocked there. Seeing a ban window unexpectedly can be a shock and Wikiindex wants to warn potential Conservapedia users about that risk. I'm not talking about intentional vandals. They know what to expect. If you read the section that I restored you will see that users can get blocked and do get blocked for doing things that would be allowed or even considered constructive on other wikis. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 07:34, 25 February 2009 (EST) | [[Conservapedia]] has been the subject of arguments. There seems to be a compromise that users need information about how to avoid getting blocked there. Seeing a ban window unexpectedly can be a shock and Wikiindex wants to warn potential Conservapedia users about that risk. I'm not talking about intentional vandals. They know what to expect. If you read the section that I restored you will see that users can get blocked and do get blocked for doing things that would be allowed or even considered constructive on other wikis. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 07:34, 25 February 2009 (EST) | ||
That's why I don't like Conservapedia, but that section seemed like it was intended to scare possible users away from that wiki. It was also poorly written.--[[User:GetSmartFan44|GetSmartFan44]] 09:53, 25 February 2009 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:53, 25 February 2009
Conservapedia has been the subject of arguments. There seems to be a compromise that users need information about how to avoid getting blocked there. Seeing a ban window unexpectedly can be a shock and Wikiindex wants to warn potential Conservapedia users about that risk. I'm not talking about intentional vandals. They know what to expect. If you read the section that I restored you will see that users can get blocked and do get blocked for doing things that would be allowed or even considered constructive on other wikis. Proxima Centauri 07:34, 25 February 2009 (EST)
That's why I don't like Conservapedia, but that section seemed like it was intended to scare possible users away from that wiki. It was also poorly written.--GetSmartFan44 09:53, 25 February 2009 (EST)