6,456
edits
Talk:TourBusStop: Difference between revisions
thanks for the tone-down
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (try to lower volume) |
(thanks for the tone-down) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
This now doesn't match how other media-wiki wikis work. I really think the fact that we're producing a reference material is important, and means mediawiki was a good choice. The main article space, for me, is just the pages that would be printed in a book, were we to print out our reference material. Our wiki-node wouldn't fit in a printed reference material, but the wiki-nodes-network would fit very well. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:44, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | This now doesn't match how other media-wiki wikis work. I really think the fact that we're producing a reference material is important, and means mediawiki was a good choice. The main article space, for me, is just the pages that would be printed in a book, were we to print out our reference material. Our wiki-node wouldn't fit in a printed reference material, but the wiki-nodes-network would fit very well. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:44, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
:"We are producing a reference material" -- This is a conflict we have about what this wiki is, I think. As expressed in the Free links v CamelCase discussion I prefer an attitude of both. Meaning, just because we are a MediaWiki Wiki, doesn't mean we have to be like Wikipedia, nor does it in my mind mean that we have to be like other MediaWiki. We are a wiki... the WikiWay... [[MarkDilley]] | :"We are producing a reference material" -- This is a conflict we have about what this wiki is, I think. As expressed in the Free links v CamelCase discussion I prefer an attitude of both. Meaning, just because we are a MediaWiki Wiki, doesn't mean we have to be like Wikipedia, nor does it in my mind mean that we have to be like other MediaWiki. We are a wiki... the WikiWay... [[MarkDilley]] | ||
::Yes, we're using a mediawiki. We're using it because it's most appropriate for our purpose. If we're not producing a reference work, what are we doing? And your references to with WikiWay as if that's obvious and not only obvious but "better" in some way to something that not the WikiWay is offensive. What makes you think I'm not using the WikiWay? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:32, 5 Apr 2006 (EDT) | |||
Anything going to be added to this? —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">@</span>]] 16:12, 1 Apr 2006 (EST) | Anything going to be added to this? —[[Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">User:Sean Fennel</span>]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Times New Roman;">@</span>]] 16:12, 1 Apr 2006 (EST) | ||