User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
m (Reverted edits by 216.66.163.116 (talk) to last revision by Hoof Hearted) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCright}} | |||
==Who's Online? == | |||
'''Users Online''': <whosonline></whosonline> | |||
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} | |||
*Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}} | |||
*Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} | |||
*Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} | |||
*Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}} | |||
*Current User = {{CURRENTUSER}} | |||
Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
:Np :) ..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
==Request for neutral admin== | |||
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win! | |||
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of [[Conservapedia]], [[RationalWiki]], and [[Talk:The Conservapedia RationalWiki war|The Conservapedia RationalWiki war]]. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, [[User:Jazzman831|Jazz]][[User talk:Jazzman831|Man]] 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST) | |||
==block length== | |||
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this [[WikiIndex]] a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at [[WikiIndex:Blocking Policy]] ? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
==Dispute resolution== | |||
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThis_is_not_the_solution&diff=69572&oldid=69536 here] ~~ [[MarkDilley]] | |||
==About that "dispute resolution"...== | |||
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 [[sysop]]s to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages): | |||
[[Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
[[Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
[[Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
[[Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion]] | |||
==Hi Comets,== | |||
I recreated ;-) the page [[Christopedia]] in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and <code>{{Template|add}}</code>. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST) | |||
:oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--[[User:Comets|Comets]] 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST) | |||
==Your thoughts on upgrade and logo== | |||
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - [[WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts]] - best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
==Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all== | |||
Please check out [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
==Yes I'm all thumbs== | |||
I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again [[User:TeraS|TeraS]] 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT) | |||
==Why so rough?== | |||
It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | |||
Revision as of 03:59, 17 April 2012
Who's Online?
Users Online: <whosonline></whosonline>
- Articles = 22,027
- Pages = 37,702
- Users = 12,944
- Admins = 16
- Files = 4,788
- Current User = 192.168.144.2
Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let John Stanton know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, MarkDilley
- Np :) ..--Comets 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
Request for neutral admin
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of Conservapedia, RationalWiki, and The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, JazzMan 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
block length
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this WikiIndex a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at WikiIndex:Blocking Policy ? --DavidCary 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
Dispute resolution
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is here ~~ MarkDilley
About that "dispute resolution"...
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion
Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion
Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion
Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion
Hi Comets,
I recreated ;-) the page Christopedia in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and {{add}}. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --Wolf | talk 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)
- oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--Comets 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)
Your thoughts on upgrade and logo
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts - best, MarkDilley
Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all
Please check out WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision and WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path, Best, MarkDilley
Yes I'm all thumbs
I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again TeraS 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
Why so rough?
It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, MarkDilley