Bureaucrats, checkuser, Interface administrators, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Suppressors, Administrators
83,693
edits
User talk:JenniferForUnity: Difference between revisions
m
fix double-redirects, fix red links
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (fix double redirect) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Love your ideas about categories! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:44, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | Love your ideas about categories! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:44, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
== category discussion == | ==category discussion== | ||
Thanks much for helping us gel. Mostly we need energy around the category topic to make the change happen. Thanks so much! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:49, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | Thanks much for helping us gel. Mostly we need energy around the category topic to make the change happen. Thanks so much! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 17:49, 16 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
: I like the category discussion template as a way to help us bring the project into focus -- it's obviously something we've struggled with and that was a great idea. Thanks very much for the added brainpower! [[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Ray King|talk]]</small> 14:31, 18 October 2006 (EDT) | : I like the category discussion template as a way to help us bring the project into focus -- it's obviously something we've struggled with and that was a great idea. Thanks very much for the added brainpower! [[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Ray King|talk]]</small> 14:31, 18 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
== Chord struck == | ==Chord struck== | ||
:<tt>If values like Pragmatism, Civility, Inclusion, Compromise, Transparency turn you on, please please please check on the Unity Movement.</tt> | :<tt>If values like Pragmatism, Civility, Inclusion, Compromise, Transparency turn you on, please please please check on the Unity Movement.</tt> | ||
I had to respond to this, because all those things do strike a chord with me. I'm not American and won't get involved in | I had to respond to this, because all those things do strike a chord with me. I'm not American and won't get involved in Unity08 but will watch with interest. I do occasionally check on the [[Wikia Campaigns|Campaigns Wikia]] and tell people about it. And I'm mainly involved with [[Appropedia]], which is also about changing the world, but from a different angle. | ||
Strength to you. --[[User:Singkong2005|Chris Watkins/Singkong2005]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Singkong2005|talk]]</sup></small> 22:41, 17 October 2006 (EDT) | Strength to you. --[[User:Singkong2005|Chris Watkins/Singkong2005]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Singkong2005|talk]]</sup></small> 22:41, 17 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Sounds like these sites need to be on the [[ChicagoCoop.net]] WikiNode (except we don't have one yet)! I live in a housing co-op in Chicago and started that wiki. I haven't put any energy into it, however, so it's not really going anywhere yet. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:04, 19 October 2006 (EDT) | Sounds like these sites need to be on the [[ChicagoCoop.net]] WikiNode (except we don't have one yet)! I live in a housing co-op in Chicago and started that wiki. I haven't put any energy into it, however, so it's not really going anywhere yet. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:04, 19 October 2006 (EDT) | ||
== opinion about redlink categories == | ==opinion about redlink categories== | ||
Jennifer, really glad to see you back! Excellent work on the category system (again)! Just wanted to let you know my opinion about | Jennifer, really glad to see you back! Excellent work on the category system (again)! Just wanted to let you know my opinion about [[red link]] categories. The way I see it, they're not broken, they're future links. I totally agree with you about vanity categories and at the same time, the only reliable way we'll know if there are 3 wikis in a same neighborhood in NYC is to let them each tag as a neighborhood and have those tags be redlinks until we know there are three. Feel free to move this comment elsewhere if you can think of a more suitable location, in case others also want to comment. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks! [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 12:17, 31 October 2006 (EST) | ||
: Just to throw my two cents in. Dangling links / red links / future links, are extremely important because they invite future people to the wiki to participate. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | : Just to throw my two cents in. Dangling links / red links / future links, are extremely important because they invite future people to the wiki to participate. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
== Wiki Lists == | ==Wiki Lists== | ||
Hello Jenny, | Hello Jenny, [[:Category:OpenEdit|OpenEdit]] - [[:Category:Vibrant|Vibrant]] and [[:Category:Active|Active]] are important categories/lists. Is there someway that you can highlight them if not in the actual [[:Category:Wiki Lists]]? Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
== what happened? == | ==what happened?== | ||
Dear JenniferForUnity, I am sorry to see that the [[ | Dear JenniferForUnity, I am sorry to see that the [[UnityWiki]] has gone offline. Is there anything I can do to help? --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 00:43, 2 October 2007 (EDT) | ||