User:Torchickens: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (wikilinks) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (added Category:AccountUsed2011 using HotCat) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*I reject the irony of [[English Wikipedia|Wikipedia's]] notability criteria for deleting articles or reverting edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press. | *I reject the irony of [[English Wikipedia|Wikipedia's]] notability criteria for deleting articles or reverting edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press. | ||
**There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity. | **There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity. | ||
[[Category:AccountUsed2011]] | |||
Revision as of 23:26, 26 January 2019
My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'
- Information should be free and accessible to all.
- I believe pay-to-edit Wikis are this an allusion to universities and other institutions, which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence.
- I support the Anti-Wikia Alliance to some extent. Wikia should not make changes to its layout permanently without the consent of its individual Wikis.
- However, I believe that people should not set up Wikis on the Wikia service for the sake of simply abandoning them and 'sporking' them on to an independent Wiki for later.
- I believe pay-to-edit Wikis are this an allusion to universities and other institutions, which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence.
- I reject the irony of Wikipedia's notability criteria for deleting articles or reverting edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press.
- There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity.