1,756
edits
Talk:ChildWiki: Difference between revisions
→Recentism: new section
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Edit war: new section) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (→Recentism: new section) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
If people have concerns about the page, it would be appropriate to discuss, in accordance with the [[BRD cycle]]. Otherwise, I'm going to wait a week and then revert you again, because you haven't made any arguments in support of your changes. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 00:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | If people have concerns about the page, it would be appropriate to discuss, in accordance with the [[BRD cycle]]. Otherwise, I'm going to wait a week and then revert you again, because you haven't made any arguments in support of your changes. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 00:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Recentism == | |||
With respect to [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=ChildWiki&curid=42170&diff=176129&oldid=175939 this edit], please explain why "recentism" is bad. On Wikipedia, recentism is simply noted with a "current events" tag to inform people that events are rapidly unfolding. Recent events are often what people are most interested in; it's why people buy the newest edition of a newspaper, and subscribe to dailies rather than weeklies. I recommend reverting, but since this is one of the most controversial articles on the wiki lately, I figured we should discuss first. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 11:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC) | |||