5,933
edits
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Obscenety: what is it?) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:45, 11 August 2015 (PDT) | --[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:45, 11 August 2015 (PDT) | ||
:'''Right''' Hence "graphic nudity". Did you read what I wrote? [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 16:55, 14 August 2015 (PDT) | :'''Right''' Hence "graphic nudity". Did you read what I wrote? [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 16:55, 14 August 2015 (PDT) | ||
The term "graphic nudity" seems to be no real definition. Someone on the net wrote: '' ...the MPAA means by some of its cryptic, unhelpful phrases related to naked bodies ... "Graphic nudity" is what is more commonly referred to as "full frontal." '' | |||
These are euphemisms and circumlocutions. But circumlocutions have no place at all in an explanation of a definition or policy. Whereas ''full frontal'' is an euphemism as well however well known this term may be, commonly used in [[Boobpedia]]. | |||
I think that the term "patently offensive" even though very subjective, would be a better part of the definition. Is it meant to arouse? (Anger, fright, lust...). As such anything humorous would be not part of the definition, which should also be mentioned. --[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:09, 15 August 2015 (PDT) | |||
edits