Proposal:Future linking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (proposals) |
(coding change needed?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
** [[Upcoming.org_Community]] | ** [[Upcoming.org_Community]] | ||
** [[BaylesShanks]] | ** [[BaylesShanks]] | ||
* clearer example | * clearer example | ||
** [[ThisIsaFutureLink]] | ** [[ThisIsaFutureLink]] | ||
=== comments === | |||
The mediawiki default for internal links to pages that don't exist is to have the text be red. This is different from usemod, for example (with the question mark). If we could somehow have these external wikilinks show up as redlinks or question marks (same as internal links for that user), then I'd be in favor of this. Until then, I think it's confusing to have an external link that doesn't go to an active page and that looks the same as any other external link. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 11:44, 17 May 2006 (EDT) | |||
[[Category:Proposals]] | [[Category:Proposals]] | ||
Revision as of 15:44, 17 May 2006
Proposal 26-Feb-2006: Future linking
Specifically I am thinking about WikiNodes that need to be created. But as a theoretical issue, I think it helps people to understand the whole internet could be wiki. WikiBardo is along these lines. MarkDilley
- examples:
- clearer example
comments
The mediawiki default for internal links to pages that don't exist is to have the text be red. This is different from usemod, for example (with the question mark). If we could somehow have these external wikilinks show up as redlinks or question marks (same as internal links for that user), then I'd be in favor of this. Until then, I think it's confusing to have an external link that doesn't go to an active page and that looks the same as any other external link. TedErnst | talk 11:44, 17 May 2006 (EDT)