Template:Wiki spotlight: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(shorten article length)
(Collaboration at work)
Line 4: Line 4:
| Heading = Wiki Spotlight
| Heading = Wiki Spotlight
| NewsLeft =
| NewsLeft =
=== [http://recentchanges.info/?p=88 Collaboration at work] ===
[http://blog.wirearchy.com/blog/_archives/2006/6/27/2060712.html Wirearchy] quotes [http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6087566.html CNET News.com's Martin LaMonica's story] about collaboration and wikis:
: ''"This way of capturing collaborative wisdom, collective knowledge is a different take on knowledge management, '''which was fundamentally flawed'''" (said IBM Lotus Division general manager Michael Rhodin).
| NewsCenter =


=== [http://recentchanges.info/?p=87 A knowledge revolution that has hardly begun] ===
=== [http://recentchanges.info/?p=87 A knowledge revolution that has hardly begun] ===
Line 13: Line 20:
Refreshing to see others with the hopeful vision, nice work [http://www.plugincinema.com/plugin/index.php Ana Kronschnabel and Thomas Rawlings]
Refreshing to see others with the hopeful vision, nice work [http://www.plugincinema.com/plugin/index.php Ana Kronschnabel and Thomas Rawlings]


| NewsCenter =  
| NewsRight  =  


=== [http://recentchanges.info/?p=86 Businesses in a world of wiki] ===
=== [http://recentchanges.info/?p=86 Businesses in a world of wiki] ===
Line 23: Line 30:


They mention Eli Lilly and Co. and the edits to that page on Wikipedia, but what I can imagine is companies having to figure out what to do with an entire wiki dedicated to the pharmaceutical industry or even to  Eli Lilly and Co. itself.  This forces transparency.  This forces companies to change the way the operate their business.  (for example see what [[SourceWatch]] is doing in terms of think tanks and the like.)  Of course this all centers on the idea that people will embrace the simplistic self organization of wiki, which I excited to see.  (see [http://recentchanges.info/?p=78 Why wiki is good for work])
They mention Eli Lilly and Co. and the edits to that page on Wikipedia, but what I can imagine is companies having to figure out what to do with an entire wiki dedicated to the pharmaceutical industry or even to  Eli Lilly and Co. itself.  This forces transparency.  This forces companies to change the way the operate their business.  (for example see what [[SourceWatch]] is doing in terms of think tanks and the like.)  Of course this all centers on the idea that people will embrace the simplistic self organization of wiki, which I excited to see.  (see [http://recentchanges.info/?p=78 Why wiki is good for work])
| NewsRight  =
=== [http://recentchanges.info/?p=85 Hoped this was going to make a splash, humor works all the time.]===
''June 20, 2006''
:''"If you haven't seen Ze Frank's hilarious [http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/06/061206.html videoblog], it's worth checking out... on Friday he allowed his show to be written by his viewers who battled out 2,000+ script revisions in a [[Zefrank|Wiki]]. Sunday's [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/fashion/sundaystyles/18ze.html New York Times] describes the results."  via [http://slashdot.org/articles/06/06/19/1718219.shtml Slashdot]''
Ze Frank is getting more popular, and one of the tricks in his bag is a wiki that he is encouraging folks to help write the daily 3 minute video weblog show.  Very fun.  After the first script was written by many, many folks fighting to have what they thought funny be on the front of the script, it was like writing by committee.  I suggested they think about the wiki in a different way, and [http://www.zefrank.com/wiki/index.php/Talk:Fabuloso_Friday/The_Script#no_need_to_focus_on_one_version.2C_with_wiki_there_could_be_many_versions reconsider focusing on the main page].


}}
}}

Revision as of 07:51, 29 June 2006

Wiki Spotlight

Collaboration at work

Wirearchy quotes CNET News.com's Martin LaMonica's story about collaboration and wikis:

"This way of capturing collaborative wisdom, collective knowledge is a different take on knowledge management, which was fundamentally flawed" (said IBM Lotus Division general manager Michael Rhodin).

A knowledge revolution that has hardly begun

June 26, 2006

An excellent article, The Independent: New Media: Who are the real winners now we've all gone Wiki-crazy?

What wiki does for its users is what blogging did for web publishing: it provides an easy, quick, means to an end. In the words of Ward Cunningham, an author and an inventor of wiki technology: "Wiki does for knowledge what the assembly line does for material."

Refreshing to see others with the hopeful vision, nice work Ana Kronschnabel and Thomas Rawlings

Businesses in a world of wiki

June 23, 2006

This article from Asbury Park Press makes an interesting point about how companies will have to manage their PR in the "free-wheeling online world of Wikipedia." It seems to me the writer either doesn't understand wiki or is just choosing to focus on a large website, Wikipedia.

What is more interesting to me is what companies and governmental organizations are going to have to do, or not have to do, in a "free-wheeling online world of" wiki.

They mention Eli Lilly and Co. and the edits to that page on Wikipedia, but what I can imagine is companies having to figure out what to do with an entire wiki dedicated to the pharmaceutical industry or even to Eli Lilly and Co. itself. This forces transparency. This forces companies to change the way the operate their business. (for example see what SourceWatch is doing in terms of think tanks and the like.) Of course this all centers on the idea that people will embrace the simplistic self organization of wiki, which I excited to see. (see Why wiki is good for work)