WikiIndex:Anti-spam measures: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* First measure (Première mesure) | * First measure (Première mesure) | ||
==Human users== | |||
Spammers regularly targetted Old [[Liberapedia]] and the Wiki has out of date software. Sysops deleted articles that were entirely spam and blocked spammers. Ordinary users replaced spam with delete templates and aleted sysops. Spam in good articles was reverted. Over about 2 months spammers decided targeting Liberapedia wasn't worthwhile. Spam reduced to a trickle. New Liberapedia has better software and should be less vulnerable. If humans guard their Wiki systematically this helps even with bad software. | |||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
Revision as of 08:06, 11 June 2008
Place your favorite AntiSpam measures here, organize by Wiki Engine
Mettez ici vos mesures AntiSpam préférées, organisées par Moteur Wiki
Please use SpamBlacklist extension ! Marc 08:18, 17 July 2006 (EDT)
MediaWiki
- The admins at This Might Be A Wiki have a bot crawl the wiki constantly searching for spam and automatically blocks offenders. I'm not sure how they got it to do that, but it seems to have a low rate of false positives. —User:Sean Fennel@ 15:02, 27 Mar 2006 (EST)
- Spam blacklist
OddMuse
- First measure
PhpWiki
- First measure (Première mesure)
Human users
Spammers regularly targetted Old Liberapedia and the Wiki has out of date software. Sysops deleted articles that were entirely spam and blocked spammers. Ordinary users replaced spam with delete templates and aleted sysops. Spam in good articles was reverted. Over about 2 months spammers decided targeting Liberapedia wasn't worthwhile. Spam reduced to a trickle. New Liberapedia has better software and should be less vulnerable. If humans guard their Wiki systematically this helps even with bad software.
Discussion
Interested in the anti spam measures in development from WikiSym2005
- Sure am! Any interesting developments??? John 12:44, 27 October 2006 (EDT)