62
edits
Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::The Kangaroo article is actually a prime example. The 'evolution' explanation, and the 'Dreamtime' explanation is one sentence each. Any attempt to expand that with facts and cites, such as [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kangaroo&diff=484470&oldid=484440 here] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kangaroo&diff=486920&oldid=485503 here] is reverted. The Talk page is also interesting reading. [[User:92.23.39.38|92.23.39.38]] 16:46, 31 July 2008 (EDT) | :::The Kangaroo article is actually a prime example. The 'evolution' explanation, and the 'Dreamtime' explanation is one sentence each. Any attempt to expand that with facts and cites, such as [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kangaroo&diff=484470&oldid=484440 here] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Kangaroo&diff=486920&oldid=485503 here] is reverted. The Talk page is also interesting reading. [[User:92.23.39.38|92.23.39.38]] 16:46, 31 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
::::What you want Conservapedia to do is give evolution more validity than the other views which gives the impression that the other world views sould be disregarded. --[[User:Deborah|Deborah]] 17:23, 31 July 2008 (EDT) | ::::What you want Conservapedia to do is give evolution more validity than the other views which gives the impression that the other world views sould be disregarded. --[[User:Deborah|Deborah]] 17:23, 31 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::::[http://controversy.wearscience.com/ Teach the Controversy!] --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 20:21, 1 August 2008 (EDT) | |||