Talk:Conservapedia: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::What you want Conservapedia to do is give evolution more validity than the other views which gives the impression that the other world views sould be disregarded. --[[User:Deborah|Deborah]] 17:23, 31 July 2008 (EDT) | ::::What you want Conservapedia to do is give evolution more validity than the other views which gives the impression that the other world views sould be disregarded. --[[User:Deborah|Deborah]] 17:23, 31 July 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::::[http://controversy.wearscience.com/ Teach the Controversy!] --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 20:21, 1 August 2008 (EDT) | :::::[http://controversy.wearscience.com/ Teach the Controversy!] --[[User:Gulik|Gulik]] 20:21, 1 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::::Deborah, firstly, it seems, by what you say, that you see something wrong with adding cited, verifiable facts to a wiki that claims to be an encyclopedia, which, frankly, I simply cannot comprehend at all. Secondly, applying your own reasoning and logic leads to the conclusion that, as things stand right now, the Christian young earth creationism point of view is given substantially more validity than any other (and not just on that article, but on the site as a whole), leading to the conclusion that all other views should be disregarded. Therefore, your own argument logically leads to the conclusion that Conservapedia is, indeed, a fundamentalist Christian site. [[User:92.2.172.142|92.2.172.142]] 22:53, 1 August 2008 (EDT) | |||