WikiIndex:ProposalArchive: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Proposal 2006-02-18 Glossary ==
I propose we make a [[Glossary]] with all of the WikiIndex terms so people don't get mixed up with stuff like "Private" vs. "Personal", etc. --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 02:18, 19 Feb 2006 (EST)
: yes, and I don't think this type of thing needs a proposal [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:08, 21 Feb 2006 (EST)
* ok fair enough --[[Raymond King]] | <small>[[User talk:Rathbone|talk]]</small> 03:27, 23 Feb 2006 (EST)
==Proposal: 2006-01-28: Coding comments for more transparent clarity==
==Proposal: 2006-01-28: Coding comments for more transparent clarity==
* More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves.  I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]
* More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves.  I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) [[User:MarkDilley|MarkDilley]]

Revision as of 08:27, 23 February 2006

Proposal 2006-02-18 Glossary

I propose we make a Glossary with all of the WikiIndex terms so people don't get mixed up with stuff like "Private" vs. "Personal", etc. --Raymond King | talk 02:18, 19 Feb 2006 (EST)

yes, and I don't think this type of thing needs a proposal TedErnst | talk 13:08, 21 Feb 2006 (EST)

Proposal: 2006-01-28: Coding comments for more transparent clarity

  • More transparent wiki conversation/work. We start to code our page work in the summary as much as possilbe, as to model transparent conversation on the recent changes page, for newbies, and really ourselves. I just think it will only help to do as much coding as possible :-) MarkDilley
  • I propose that we are now doing this and this proposal can be moved to a completed proposals area. --Raymond King | talk 18:37, 18 Feb 2006 (EST)
  • We should put this in the Guidelines, agreed upon area, if I understand that area correctly.

Proposal: 2006-02-17: Tag and category use

  • Tags would be used in the description field of the page, either inline or as a bulleted list, whatever the editor wishes, using the tag template.
example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit&section=1
  • Categories would be used as media wiki currently understands them for the footer grouping. They would be placed above the template code for two reasons:
  1. cleaner for the site/newbies
  2. put them infront of template categories in the footer section, to highlight them.
example: http://www.wikiindex.com/index.php?title=ArborWiki&action=edit

Please indicate your approval (or not) here: