User talk:Pzgesvd: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(What?)
Line 61: Line 61:


(12) tiled LU without pivoting
(12) tiled LU without pivoting
== What? ==
Pardon my asking, but what is all this you're doing with this page? &mdash;&nbsp;<span style="font-family: Kristen ITC, Comic Sans MS;">[[User:Sean Fennel]][[User talk:Sean Fennel|@]]</span> 00:58, 10 September 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 04:58, 10 September 2008

bidiagonal reduction code function matching

DGEQRT --- LQR1

DTSQRT --- LQR2

DLARTB --- LUP1

DSSRFT --- LUP2


DGEQRT --- RQR1

DTSQRT --- RQR2

DLARTB --- RUP1

DSSRFT --- RUP2

delete lines from files using sed

sed -ie '1,11d' dgetrf.c

original files are backed up in the .ce files

refer to [1]

low cost stack for function call?

can the stacking operation of the dag chasing be reduced so the overhead is minimized?

clapack3.1.1 blas testing handtune

in the testing routines, eps is wrongly calculated as 1e-19, which should be 1e-7. In each files (dblat3.c, for example), a new piece of eps code is inserted.

For double precision (complex16), problem exists for not accurate element result.

a recall of all the work that I've done

(1) Complex version SVD for ScaLAPACK

(2) RFP for LAPACK

(3) Performance comparison between PLAPACK & SCALAPACK

(4) Re-write PDGETRF, optimization with look-ahead and other threading method for better performance on multi-core cluster

(5) CELL learning

(6) Variations of LU, Chol and QR for LAPACK

(7) CLAPACK conversion

(8) ScaLAPACK auto-tuning

(9) DAG automatic generation for LAPACK

(10) Using random butterfly transformation to remove pivoting

(11) ILP64 support for LAPACK, ScaLAPACK

(12) tiled LU without pivoting

What?

Pardon my asking, but what is all this you're doing with this page? — User:Sean Fennel@ 00:58, 10 September 2008 (EDT)