4,624
edits
(→"good pages" for MediaWikis: other places we talk about how to measure size) |
(→"good pages" for MediaWikis: I suggest a deal :-)) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
: And yes, I think wikis are cool, because "edit this" is often the solution to just about any problem on a wiki. | : And yes, I think wikis are cool, because "edit this" is often the solution to just about any problem on a wiki. | ||
: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 00:03, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | : --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 00:03, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
:: I think the problem is, that, MediaWiki-based wikis are discriminated a little by doing so. Ok, the value ''All Pages'' is much too high indeed - because Images and Categories can be very poor in information. Let's keep that in mind. It seems to be a good deal to support two MediaWiki-specific property names within the to-do new [[template:wiki]]: <code>mw_good_pages</code> and <code>mw_all_pages</code>, displaing both values and autocategorizing only by the first one. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:06, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | |||
edits