4,624
edits
(→"good pages" for MediaWikis: "good" and "total" from raw view used for wm_-parameters) |
(as of) |
||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
: --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 00:03, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | : --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 00:03, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
:: I think the problem is, that, MediaWiki-based wikis are discriminated a little by doing so. Ok, the value ''All Pages'' is much too high indeed - because Images and Categories can be very poor in information. Let's keep that in mind. It seems to be a good deal to support two MediaWiki-specific property names within the to-do new [[template:wiki]]: <code>mw_good_pages</code> and <code>mw_total_pages</code>, displaing both values and autocategorizing only by the first one. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:06, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | :: I think the problem is, that, MediaWiki-based wikis are discriminated a little by doing so. Ok, the value ''All Pages'' is much too high indeed - because Images and Categories can be very poor in information. Let's keep that in mind. It seems to be a good deal to support two MediaWiki-specific property names within the to-do new [[template:wiki]]: <code>mw_good_pages</code> and <code>mw_total_pages</code>, displaing both values and autocategorizing only by the first one. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:06, 21 April 2009 (EDT) | ||
== as of == | |||
I'd suggest a new parameter for smart time stamping. This can be done unsing a template with the subst-syntax. Please have a look at {{Template|now}}. Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:10, 12 November 2009 (EST) | |||
edits