Category talk:Wiki language: Difference between revisions
m (Fixing signature :-) |
(adding Category:Proposals -- anything else I need to do to make this into an "official" proposal?) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== "Category:Latin" vs "Category:Wiki Latin" == | == "Category:Latin" vs "Category:Wiki Latin" == | ||
== language category simplification proposal == | |||
Someone is starting to set up two parallel categories of languages. | Someone is starting to set up two parallel categories of languages. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
Alas, currently most articles in such categories are miscategorized -- they have one tag when they "should" have the other tag. | Alas, currently most articles in such categories are miscategorized -- they have one tag when they "should" have the other tag. | ||
Category simplification proposal: | '''Category simplification proposal:''' | ||
* Add one new category that indicates that our article is about a wiki that discusses some language itself; perhaps [[:Category: linguistic]] or [[:Category: language]]. | * Add one new category that indicates that our article is about a wiki that discusses some language itself; perhaps [[:Category: linguistic]] or [[:Category: language]]. | ||
* Get rid of all the "Category:Wiki Latin" and similar categories; edit pages that use them to use the simpler "Category:Latin" and similar categories. | * Get rid of all the "Category:Wiki Latin" and similar categories; edit pages that use them to use the simpler "Category:Latin" and similar categories. | ||
| Line 27: | Line 29: | ||
:I think Speckmade initiated the parallel categories for languages. I've tried to help correct pages that ended up being miscategorized as a result of the change. However, I would prefer the simpler solution of putting all wikis about language itself into a [[:Category:Linguistics]] or some such. The disadvantage of not being able to easily find a specific language is true, but I think it's an easier-to-maintain solution. Also, if we find that a sub-category is needed for any particular language due to a large number of entries in the linguistics category, we can always add that later. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 20:36, 30 March 2009 (EDT) | :I think Speckmade initiated the parallel categories for languages. I've tried to help correct pages that ended up being miscategorized as a result of the change. However, I would prefer the simpler solution of putting all wikis about language itself into a [[:Category:Linguistics]] or some such. The disadvantage of not being able to easily find a specific language is true, but I think it's an easier-to-maintain solution. Also, if we find that a sub-category is needed for any particular language due to a large number of entries in the linguistics category, we can always add that later. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] 20:36, 30 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
[[Category:Proposals]] | |||
Revision as of 02:54, 29 May 2009
Should there be a distinction between wikis that are bilingual (e.g. WikiIndex-English & French), multilingual (e.g. Wikimedia Commons-multiple languages used within the same wiki), and multiple languages (e.g. most Wikimedia Foundation projects, such as the Wikipedia that have versions in different languages [as subdomains])? User:BlankVerse | talk 00:44, 27 Mar 2006 (EST)
Merge to "Language"?
Wiki Language is confusing - sounds like it's about wiki markup or some such thing. Merge into Category:Language? Articles in Category:Language can stay in the root category, and the subcategory can be for specific languages. --Chris Watkins a.k.a. Singkong2005 talk 21:39, 2 September 2006 (EDT)
"Category:Latin" vs "Category:Wiki Latin"
language category simplification proposal
Someone is starting to set up two parallel categories of languages.
- categories like "Category: Wiki Latin"
- categories like "Category: Latin"
Alas, currently most articles in such categories are miscategorized -- they have one tag when they "should" have the other tag.
Category simplification proposal:
- Add one new category that indicates that our article is about a wiki that discusses some language itself; perhaps Category: linguistic or Category: language.
- Get rid of all the "Category:Wiki Latin" and similar categories; edit pages that use them to use the simpler "Category:Latin" and similar categories.
Advantage: one kind of language category, rather than two, saves time and effort and confusion.
Disadvantage: people looking for a wiki that discusses the Latin language (or discusses some other specific language) must a little more work -- instead of going right to a category that exclusively lists "wiki that discuss the Latin language", they must dig through a long list of wiki in "Category: linguistic" or "Category: language" looking for the wiki that discuss their specific language of interest.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Are there other advantages/disadvantages that I am missing? --DavidCary 15:17, 3 February 2009 (EST)
- I think Speckmade initiated the parallel categories for languages. I've tried to help correct pages that ended up being miscategorized as a result of the change. However, I would prefer the simpler solution of putting all wikis about language itself into a Category:Linguistics or some such. The disadvantage of not being able to easily find a specific language is true, but I think it's an easier-to-maintain solution. Also, if we find that a sub-category is needed for any particular language due to a large number of entries in the linguistics category, we can always add that later. --MarvelZuvembie 20:36, 30 March 2009 (EDT)