Category talk:Wiki status: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Is there any useful difference between "inactive" status vs "dead" status?) |
(→dead vs inactive: re) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Is there any useful difference between "inactive" status vs "dead" status? | Is there any useful difference between "inactive" status vs "dead" status? | ||
--[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 09:30, 7 July 2009 (EDT) | --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] 09:30, 7 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
: It seems to be no difference between inactive and dead. I'd suggest to merge "inactive" into "dead". An edit on the wiki template could do this automatically. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 09:36, 7 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:36, 7 July 2009
Are there definitions for these Status messages I can use in deciding which to choose? TedErnst 01:18, 19 Jan 2006 (EST)
- Definitions have been added.
Hi, are ~1000 unique visitor per day enough to be vibrant? Please corrct my entry, if not: AtmWiki 84.137.212.109 04:05, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT)
dead vs inactive
I see there is a Category:Inactive with a related Template:Inactive, and a Category:Dead with a related Template:Wiki dead.
Is there any useful difference between "inactive" status vs "dead" status? --DavidCary 09:30, 7 July 2009 (EDT)