Talk:WikiSynergy: Difference between revisions
(Copyright-- nofollow attribute) |
Huw Powell (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The [[RationalWiki]] attitude to [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Saloon_bar#Wikisynergy Wikisynergy], and here,s a [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&oldid=406560#Wikisynergy permanent link]. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 03:25, 24 July 2009 (EDT) | The [[RationalWiki]] attitude to [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/RationalWiki:Saloon_bar#Wikisynergy Wikisynergy], and here,s a [http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=RationalWiki:Saloon_bar&oldid=406560#Wikisynergy permanent link]. [[User:Proxima Centauri|Proxima Centauri]] 03:25, 24 July 2009 (EDT) | ||
:We'll see if it is still there if RationalWiki comes back online. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:04, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | :We'll see if it is still there if RationalWiki comes back online. [[User:Lumenos|Lumenos]] 08:04, 6 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::You might want to tread lightly there, since I wrote most of both of those wiki's articles on each other. There's a bit of humor trickling around in there I suspect. [[User:Huw Powell|Huw Powell]] 18:55, 20 September 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Copyright-- nofollow attribute == | == Copyright-- nofollow attribute == | ||
Revision as of 22:55, 20 September 2009
Reviews
The RationalWiki attitude to Wikisynergy, and here,s a permanent link. Proxima Centauri 03:25, 24 July 2009 (EDT)
- We'll see if it is still there if RationalWiki comes back online. Lumenos 08:04, 6 September 2009 (EDT)
- You might want to tread lightly there, since I wrote most of both of those wiki's articles on each other. There's a bit of humor trickling around in there I suspect. Huw Powell 18:55, 20 September 2009 (EDT)
Copyright-- nofollow attribute
The WikiSynergy copyright requires websites that use their work, to not use the nofollow html attribute.
http://www.wikisynergy.com/wiki/WikiSynergy:Copyrights#Attribution
I'm not certain but I don't think most wikifarms would allow the nofollow attribute to be turned off (or removed). Does this copyright requirement make it impossible to legally use it on wikifarms? Lumenos 18:39, 20 September 2009 (EDT)
They put this in a section titled, "Attribution" but I wonder if this is really want is meant by "attribution" in a Creative Commons license. From CC-BY-SA-3.0 "Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work)." It is difficult to say whether removing nofollow, is more like an "endorsement" or "attribution". The purpose of it must be to give them higher rankings with search engines. Lumenos 18:39, 20 September 2009 (EDT)