User talk:Patheticcockroach: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:::No problem :) [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 16:33, 31 March 2009 (EDT) | :::No problem :) [[User:Patheticcockroach|Patheticcockroach]] 16:33, 31 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all == | == Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all == | ||
Please check out [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Please check out [[WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision]] and [[WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path]], Best, [[MarkDilley]] |
Revision as of 23:30, 26 April 2011
Welcome to WikiIndex. Best, MarkDilley
- also when you find an inactive wiki, just replace Wiki in the template with Inactive. :-)
well :-)
I am not saying one is preferred over the other ;-) just the Inactive is one I have used since the start of this wiki. I haven't fully considered the otehr option. Did you see any differences other than name? Best, MarkDilley
- ah, I remember - do the categories at the bottom stay the same, when changing the status? The Inactive template cancels those out, so the categories stay cleaner. I think that was the intent. Best, MarkDilley
- Thanks for reverting vandalism, I've blocked the vandal. Proxima Centauri 15:25, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
- No problem :) Patheticcockroach 16:33, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
- Thanks for reverting vandalism, I've blocked the vandal. Proxima Centauri 15:25, 31 March 2009 (EDT)
Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all
Please check out WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision and WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path, Best, MarkDilley