Talk:WikiIndex: Difference between revisions
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (→edit protect requests: new section) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (fix redirects, wikilinks, tidy bare URLs, replied to last comment) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
should the langauge here be multilingual or english? --[[User:Rathbone|Ray]] 11:43, 22 Jan 2006 (EST) | {{TOCright}} | ||
should the langauge here be [[:Category:Wiki Multilingual|multilingual]] or [[:Category:Wiki English|english]]? --[[User:Rathbone|Ray]] 11:43, 22 Jan 2006 (EST) | |||
== Publicize! == | ==Publicize!== | ||
It is a shame that WikiIndex has such limited community visibility! Would one of the founders please put articles about WikiIndex in at least Wikinfo and WikiKnowledge, where I believe they would be welcome? I would do it, but I can't figure out the cross-licensing hassles... Or, please release a description of WikiIndex into the Public Domain, that anyone can freely post anywhere? (Do quite like the WikiIndex History article, by the way.) Took me over a day of searching to stumble on the existence of WI -- Let's try to make it easier for others to find. (I understand, there is really nothing we can do about the low visibility in the wiki-which-must-not-be-named, where it would be most appropriate and useful.)--[[User:69.87.200.5|69.87.200.5]] 18:07, 4 February 2007 (PST) | It is a shame that [[WikiIndex]] has such limited community visibility! Would one of the founders please put articles about WikiIndex in at least [[Wikinfo]] and [[WikiKnowledge]], where I believe they would be welcome? I would do it, but I can't figure out the cross-licensing hassles... Or, please release a description of WikiIndex into the Public Domain, that anyone can freely post anywhere? (Do quite like the WikiIndex History article, by the way.) Took me over a day of searching to stumble on the existence of WI -- Let's try to make it easier for others to find. (I understand, there is really nothing we can do about the low visibility in the wiki-which-must-not-be-named, where it would be most appropriate and useful.)--[[User:69.87.200.5|69.87.200.5]] 18:07, 4 February 2007 (PST) | ||
:: Much discussion about the next step for WikiIndex at RecentChangesCamp in Portland this last weekend (Feb 2-4, 2007) see the [http://2007.recentchangescamp.org/Wiki_Index session notes]. The theme of the session was really how to make it more of a community resource and we welcome any discussion/suggestions along that line. [[User:John Stanton|John]] 07:57, 5 February 2007 (PST) | :: Much discussion about the next step for WikiIndex at RecentChangesCamp in Portland this last weekend (Feb 2-4, 2007) see the [http://2007.recentchangescamp.org/Wiki_Index session notes]. The theme of the session was really how to make it more of a community resource and we welcome any discussion/suggestions along that line. [[User:John Stanton|John]] 07:57, 5 February 2007 (PST) | ||
::: So much to talk about... Could someone please work on giving us all access to useful recent traffic/pageview data, so we can see how much general use this wiki is getting, and whether it is increasing? | ::: So much to talk about... Could someone please work on giving us all access to useful recent traffic/pageview data, so we can see how much general use this wiki is getting, and whether it is increasing? [[Special:Popularpages]] would almost be useful, but needs at least one more column for "views in the last 30 days" -- total views ever is just not very useful (and it doesn't even tell us, starting from when). [[Special:Statistics]] also suffers from not giving us any recent-time-window data. What we really want to see is some nice weekly/monthly graphs for the last year. *** Its weird that the standard [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] software is so limited in some ways. *** Many websites have not populated their [[Project:Copyrights]] page! You should add a direct link for that to your template here for wiki articles. (It has not been populated at the recentchangescamp wiki you link to above.) --[[User:69.87.199.195|69.87.199.195]] 07:32, 6 February 2007 (PST) | ||
Why doesn't this website have a favicon?--[[User:69.87.199.195|69.87.199.195]] 07:34, 6 February 2007 (PST) | Why doesn't this website have a favicon?--[[User:69.87.199.195|69.87.199.195]] 07:34, 6 February 2007 (PST) | ||
: ''I like the way you folks are thinking! I created a favicon [[Image:Preview 16x16.png]] but don't know where to store the .ico - after I can get it stored on the web, then I can ask [[John Stanton]] to add it. Best, [[MarkDilley]]'' | : ''I like the way you folks are thinking! I created a favicon [[Image:Preview 16x16.png]] but don't know where to store the .ico - after I can get it stored on the web, then I can ask [[John Stanton]] to add it. Best, [[MarkDilley]]'' | ||
:: The generic standard is, name it favicon.ico and store it in the html root folder. But each page served can call out a favicon file, I guess, so maybe MediaWiki has its own special way of doing things? I'm afraid your design takes the standard graphic too small -- I could not tell what it was supposed to be, even though I am familiar with the current graphic, until I compared them visually. I think it needs to be "simplified", plainer, more contrast, to work on such a small scale. And maybe the keys should be re-arranged but better use the square area available? Maybe just two separate keys?--[[User:69.87.203.22|69.87.203.22]] 06:36, 12 February 2007 (PST) | :: The generic standard is, name it favicon.ico and store it in the html root folder. But each page served can call out a favicon file, I guess, so maybe [[:Category:MediaWiki|MediaWiki]] has its own special way of doing things? I'm afraid your design takes the standard graphic too small -- I could not tell what it was supposed to be, even though I am familiar with the current graphic, until I compared them visually. I think it needs to be "simplified", plainer, more contrast, to work on such a small scale. And maybe the keys should be re-arranged but better use the square area available? Maybe just two separate keys?--[[User:69.87.203.22|69.87.203.22]] 06:36, 12 February 2007 (PST) | ||
== Feedback/Suggestions == | ==Feedback/Suggestions== | ||
There seems to be no clear system here for how/where to discuss how WikiIndex works. This page is one place. [[WikiIndex: | There seems to be no clear system here for how/where to discuss how [[WikiIndex]] works. This page is one place. [[WikiIndex:Community talk]] is another place. [[WikiIndex:FrequentlyAskedQuestions]] is another place. User talk pages is another place, particularly those pages of the core folk (you can get a list of them here: [[Special:ListUsers]]). (In some cases, you can discuss the matter right at the appropriate location, but for some matters there is no such location.)--[[User:69.87.199.67|69.87.199.67]] 06:15, 15 February 2007 (PST) | ||
== Be Merciful == | == Be Merciful == | ||
Let us spread mercy, not conflict. Let us drop the boiler plate phrase "'''edited mercilessly'''". It pretends to be a cute warning to newcomers, but is actually in deadly earnest. It is no coincidence that | Let us spread mercy, not conflict. Let us drop the boiler plate phrase "'''edited mercilessly'''". It pretends to be a cute warning to newcomers, but is actually in deadly earnest. It is no coincidence that [[:Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]] is awash in a tidal wave of antagonism, building on such a base. Let's not repeat this threat to contributors, nor encourage editors to treat other's work in such a fashion. Let us rather encourage ourselves to be '''sincere, careful, and considerate'''. *** Here is a suggestion for improved boiler plate: | ||
:All contributions to WikiIndex are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. Logos are displayed here as Fair Use, with copyrights retained by their owners (see Project:Copyrights for details). '''Anything you write here may be changed by others, and redistributed.''' You are promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION! | :All contributions to WikiIndex are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. Logos are displayed here as Fair Use, with copyrights retained by their owners (see Project:Copyrights for details). '''Anything you write here may be changed by others, and redistributed.''' You are promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION! | ||
Line 29: | Line 30: | ||
== Logo == | == Logo == | ||
Um... the logo on the infobox says "WikiIndex - SwitchWiki" while the logo in the corner of the site says "WikiIndex - IndexWiki". | Um... the logo on the infobox says "WikiIndex - SwitchWiki" while the logo in the corner of the site says "WikiIndex - IndexWiki". | ||
== Languages == | == Languages == | ||
I think a subpage for each language would be better than an endless growing [[WikiIndex]] entry. BTW: The [[Welcome]] page could be translated too (In this case I'd prefer to have an ordinary page for each language, named in this language and coupled by a navigation template). --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:14, 30 March 2009 (EDT) | I think a subpage for each language would be better than an endless growing [[WikiIndex]] entry. BTW: The [[Welcome]] page could be translated too (In this case I'd prefer to have an ordinary page for each language, named in this language and coupled by a navigation template). --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 03:14, 30 March 2009 (EDT) | ||
== edit protect requests == | == edit protect requests == | ||
Due to this article being 'edit protected', can someone please add <code><nowiki>[[Category:Semantic MediaWiki]]</nowiki></code> - thanks, [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 05:33, 23 December 2011 (PST) | Due to this article being 'edit protected', can someone please add <code><nowiki>[[Category:Semantic MediaWiki]]</nowiki></code> - thanks, [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 05:33, 23 December 2011 (PST) | ||
:Done! [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 10:30, 8 September 2012 (PDT) |
Revision as of 17:30, 8 September 2012
Template:TOCright should the langauge here be multilingual or english? --Ray 11:43, 22 Jan 2006 (EST)
Publicize!
It is a shame that WikiIndex has such limited community visibility! Would one of the founders please put articles about WikiIndex in at least Wikinfo and WikiKnowledge, where I believe they would be welcome? I would do it, but I can't figure out the cross-licensing hassles... Or, please release a description of WikiIndex into the Public Domain, that anyone can freely post anywhere? (Do quite like the WikiIndex History article, by the way.) Took me over a day of searching to stumble on the existence of WI -- Let's try to make it easier for others to find. (I understand, there is really nothing we can do about the low visibility in the wiki-which-must-not-be-named, where it would be most appropriate and useful.)--69.87.200.5 18:07, 4 February 2007 (PST)
- Much discussion about the next step for WikiIndex at RecentChangesCamp in Portland this last weekend (Feb 2-4, 2007) see the session notes. The theme of the session was really how to make it more of a community resource and we welcome any discussion/suggestions along that line. John 07:57, 5 February 2007 (PST)
- So much to talk about... Could someone please work on giving us all access to useful recent traffic/pageview data, so we can see how much general use this wiki is getting, and whether it is increasing? Special:Popularpages would almost be useful, but needs at least one more column for "views in the last 30 days" -- total views ever is just not very useful (and it doesn't even tell us, starting from when). Special:Statistics also suffers from not giving us any recent-time-window data. What we really want to see is some nice weekly/monthly graphs for the last year. *** Its weird that the standard MediaWiki software is so limited in some ways. *** Many websites have not populated their Project:Copyrights page! You should add a direct link for that to your template here for wiki articles. (It has not been populated at the recentchangescamp wiki you link to above.) --69.87.199.195 07:32, 6 February 2007 (PST)
Why doesn't this website have a favicon?--69.87.199.195 07:34, 6 February 2007 (PST)
- I like the way you folks are thinking! I created a favicon File:Preview 16x16.png but don't know where to store the .ico - after I can get it stored on the web, then I can ask John Stanton to add it. Best, MarkDilley
- The generic standard is, name it favicon.ico and store it in the html root folder. But each page served can call out a favicon file, I guess, so maybe MediaWiki has its own special way of doing things? I'm afraid your design takes the standard graphic too small -- I could not tell what it was supposed to be, even though I am familiar with the current graphic, until I compared them visually. I think it needs to be "simplified", plainer, more contrast, to work on such a small scale. And maybe the keys should be re-arranged but better use the square area available? Maybe just two separate keys?--69.87.203.22 06:36, 12 February 2007 (PST)
Feedback/Suggestions
There seems to be no clear system here for how/where to discuss how WikiIndex works. This page is one place. WikiIndex:Community talk is another place. WikiIndex:FrequentlyAskedQuestions is another place. User talk pages is another place, particularly those pages of the core folk (you can get a list of them here: Special:ListUsers). (In some cases, you can discuss the matter right at the appropriate location, but for some matters there is no such location.)--69.87.199.67 06:15, 15 February 2007 (PST)
Be Merciful
Let us spread mercy, not conflict. Let us drop the boiler plate phrase "edited mercilessly". It pretends to be a cute warning to newcomers, but is actually in deadly earnest. It is no coincidence that Wikipedia is awash in a tidal wave of antagonism, building on such a base. Let's not repeat this threat to contributors, nor encourage editors to treat other's work in such a fashion. Let us rather encourage ourselves to be sincere, careful, and considerate. *** Here is a suggestion for improved boiler plate:
- All contributions to WikiIndex are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. Logos are displayed here as Fair Use, with copyrights retained by their owners (see Project:Copyrights for details). Anything you write here may be changed by others, and redistributed. You are promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!
- Good question. There are two superficial matches at Special:Allmessages, linking to MediaWiki:Copyrightwarning and MediaWiki:Copyrightwarning2. Those two pages are locked from edits, but they don't really match the edit boiler plate, anyway, so the true source seems more deeply hidden in the software.--69.87.202.225 10:27, 17 February 2007 (PST)
- It seems I've made the change to MediaWiki:Copyrightwarning and it works. Please verify. TedErnst | talk 03:59, 27 February 2007 (PST)
Also, it would improve the editing process if this boiler plate were moved down below the Summary box and Save button. Or, maybe Summary/Save could be right over the toolbar above the edit box?--69.87.199.67 06:45, 15 February 2007 (PST)
Logo
Um... the logo on the infobox says "WikiIndex - SwitchWiki" while the logo in the corner of the site says "WikiIndex - IndexWiki".
Languages
I think a subpage for each language would be better than an endless growing WikiIndex entry. BTW: The Welcome page could be translated too (In this case I'd prefer to have an ordinary page for each language, named in this language and coupled by a navigation template). --Wolf | talk 03:14, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
edit protect requests
Due to this article being 'edit protected', can someone please add [[Category:Semantic MediaWiki]]
- thanks, Hoof Hearted 05:33, 23 December 2011 (PST)
- Done! Hoof Hearted • talk2HH 10:30, 8 September 2012 (PDT)