Template talk:Wiki size navigation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (→More compact version: reply) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (Wikilink) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== More compact version == | ==More compact version== | ||
Some CSS isn't understood yet: the border color is definitely too dark, thats why I used the class wikitable. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 00:32, 6 January 2012 (PST) | Some CSS isn't understood yet: the border color is definitely too dark, thats why I used the class wikitable. Best regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 00:32, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
:Ooooooh - that doesn't look good on IE8 - can you revert it please, or try and fix it? --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 03:47, 6 January 2012 (PST) | :Ooooooh - that doesn't look good on IE8 - can you revert it please, or try and fix it? --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 03:47, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
:::the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST) | :::the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at [[List of wikis by number of pages|list article]] and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
:::: The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link '''list''' - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button. <br/>--[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST) | :::: The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link '''list''' - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button. <br/>--[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
:::::It will take some getting used to . . . :p And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy? Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with 'accessibility' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets. --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST) | :::::It will take some getting used to . . . :p And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy? Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with '[[:Category:Accessibility|accessibility]]' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets. --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
::::::Now I replaced the link to the template page with the (kind of) "about" page. Better? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 11:04, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ::::::Now I replaced the link to the template page with the (kind of) "about" page. Better? --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 11:04, 6 January 2012 (PST) | ||
:::::::You deleted the link to the template. And I personally think column headings should be bold, just like all wikitables. I guess it looks a little 'cleaner' though . . . --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 12:30, 7 January 2012 (PST) | :::::::You deleted the link to the template. And I personally think column headings should be bold, just like all wikitables. I guess it looks a little 'cleaner' though . . . --[[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] 12:30, 7 January 2012 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:05, 22 October 2021
More compact version[edit]
Some CSS isn't understood yet: the border color is definitely too dark, thats why I used the class wikitable. Best regards --Wolf | talk 00:32, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- Ooooooh - that doesn't look good on IE8 - can you revert it please, or try and fix it? --Hoof Hearted 03:47, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- I think it's fixed now. What do you think? --Wolf | talk 03:55, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the list article only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at list article and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --Hoof Hearted 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link list - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button.
--Wolf | talk 04:43, 6 January 2012 (PST)- It will take some getting used to . . . :p And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy? Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with 'accessibility' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets. --Hoof Hearted 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- Now I replaced the link to the template page with the (kind of) "about" page. Better? --Wolf | talk 11:04, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- You deleted the link to the template. And I personally think column headings should be bold, just like all wikitables. I guess it looks a little 'cleaner' though . . . --Hoof Hearted 12:30, 7 January 2012 (PST)
- Now I replaced the link to the template page with the (kind of) "about" page. Better? --Wolf | talk 11:04, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- It will take some getting used to . . . :p And maybe for the list, how about 'list of top 1000' - or would that be too messy? Finally, the size of the word template really needs increasing - at the moment, it doesn't comply with 'accessibility' requirements for visually impared - it ought to be put underneath the 'wiki size' in brackets. --Hoof Hearted 10:09, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- The List rendering bug seems to be fixed now. The link list - yes, it's somewhat lost on the right, but I thougt of the familiar [...] button.
- the 'list' link looks kinda lost on the right - would make more sense to include it under the left 'wiki size' heading - especially as the list article only displays the first 1000 entries - oh there is another bug - look at list article and see how it has 'boilerplated' the word 'template' (not my fault - check the edit history of the list article :p) --Hoof Hearted 04:15, 6 January 2012 (PST)
- I think it's fixed now. What do you think? --Wolf | talk 03:55, 6 January 2012 (PST)