87
edits
Talk:Singularity: Difference between revisions
Agreeing with Ted and adding another reason
(disambiguation discussion) |
(Agreeing with Ted and adding another reason) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: A category could contain lots of wikis about a similar subject, all with distinctly different names, one or more of which could be the same as the category, but this is a distinct idea from disambiguation. Disambiguation is discussed at [[disambiguation]]. Perhaps we can talk more there, on the talk page? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:29, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | : A category could contain lots of wikis about a similar subject, all with distinctly different names, one or more of which could be the same as the category, but this is a distinct idea from disambiguation. Disambiguation is discussed at [[disambiguation]]. Perhaps we can talk more there, on the talk page? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 14:29, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | ||
:I'm with Ted again (sorry, Mark, nothing personal, it's just MediaWiki experience!!). Unless an article is always going to be very short, it should be on a separate page from the category of the same name, or there will be too much scrolling needed to get to the lists of subcategories and articles, which are the main value of displaying a category. [[User:Robin Patterson|robinp]] 16:26, 4 Apr 2006 (EDT) | |||