WikiIndex talk:Bureaucrats: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (replies) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::::I'm not crazy, I know it... \\[[User:Erwin|Erwin]] 14:12, 30 March 2010 (EDT) | :::::I'm not crazy, I know it... \\[[User:Erwin|Erwin]] 14:12, 30 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
::::::Yes, you are only a little impatient - let's see what time will bring. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 14:42, 30 March 2010 (EDT) | ::::::Yes, you are only a little impatient - let's see what time will bring. --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 14:42, 30 March 2010 (EDT) | ||
:::::::Well, it looks like he didn't like to be told to wait, threw his toys out of his crib, and hasn't been seen again - [[Special:Contributions/Erwin]]!!! Patience is a virtue . . . [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 10:01, 8 September 2012 (PDT) | |||
== Disadvantages to giving Bureaucrat status to all sysops? == | == Disadvantages to giving Bureaucrat status to all sysops? == | ||
Would like to know what folks think they are. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Would like to know what folks think they are. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
: Hi Mark, keep in mind, that bureaucrats cannot only grant, but also revoke rights. The most important trait of a bureaucrat is their ability to act in a circumspectly and peaceful (I hope I made understandable English here). After all, I think a few more bureaucrats would be good. Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:58, 31 January 2012 (PST) | : Hi Mark, keep in mind, that bureaucrats cannot only grant, but also revoke rights. The most important trait of a bureaucrat is their ability to act in a circumspectly and peaceful (I hope I made understandable English here). After all, I think a few more bureaucrats would be good. Regards --[[Wolf Peuker|Wolf]] | <small>[[User talk:Peu|talk]]</small> 06:58, 31 January 2012 (PST) | ||
::Another reason why not to give bureaucrat status at the same time as sysop - existing 'crats need to be satisfied that a new sysop conducts their new duties in an appropriate manner - learn to walk before you can run and all that! [[User:Hoof Hearted|Hoof Hearted]] • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 10:01, 8 September 2012 (PDT) |
Revision as of 17:01, 8 September 2012
Hi! I request adminship and cratship, but if is not good, only sysop...Erwin 08:59, 29 March 2010 (EDT)
- Why do you need sysop rights - after about 22 edits? --Wolf | talk 11:09, 29 March 2010 (EDT)
- For helping with spam, vandalism, deleting page with nonsens etc. Erwin 11:11, 29 March 2010 (EDT)
- Erwin no. You are asking bureaucrat rights everywhere. It's not a toy! CartoonistHenning 12:46, 29 March 2010 (EDT)
- I see. --Wolf | talk 14:01, 30 March 2010 (EDT)
- I'm not crazy, I know it... \\Erwin 14:12, 30 March 2010 (EDT)
- Yes, you are only a little impatient - let's see what time will bring. --Wolf | talk 14:42, 30 March 2010 (EDT)
- Well, it looks like he didn't like to be told to wait, threw his toys out of his crib, and hasn't been seen again - Special:Contributions/Erwin!!! Patience is a virtue . . . Hoof Hearted • talk2HH 10:01, 8 September 2012 (PDT)
- Yes, you are only a little impatient - let's see what time will bring. --Wolf | talk 14:42, 30 March 2010 (EDT)
- I'm not crazy, I know it... \\Erwin 14:12, 30 March 2010 (EDT)
- I see. --Wolf | talk 14:01, 30 March 2010 (EDT)
- Erwin no. You are asking bureaucrat rights everywhere. It's not a toy! CartoonistHenning 12:46, 29 March 2010 (EDT)
- For helping with spam, vandalism, deleting page with nonsens etc. Erwin 11:11, 29 March 2010 (EDT)
Disadvantages to giving Bureaucrat status to all sysops?
Would like to know what folks think they are. Best, MarkDilley
- Hi Mark, keep in mind, that bureaucrats cannot only grant, but also revoke rights. The most important trait of a bureaucrat is their ability to act in a circumspectly and peaceful (I hope I made understandable English here). After all, I think a few more bureaucrats would be good. Regards --Wolf | talk 06:58, 31 January 2012 (PST)
- Another reason why not to give bureaucrat status at the same time as sysop - existing 'crats need to be satisfied that a new sysop conducts their new duties in an appropriate manner - learn to walk before you can run and all that! Hoof Hearted • talk2HH 10:01, 8 September 2012 (PDT)