User:Torchickens: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Torchickens (talk | contribs) (New page: ==My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'== *Information should be free and accessible to all. **I believe pay-to-edit Wikis are this an allusion to universities and other institution...) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (wikilinks) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'== | ==My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'== | ||
*Information should be free and accessible to all. | *[[:Category:Information|Information]] should be free and accessible to all. | ||
**I believe pay-to-edit Wikis are this an allusion to universities and other institutions, which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence. | **I believe [[:Category:PayToEdit|pay-to-edit]] Wikis are this an allusion to [[:Category:University|universities]] and other [[:Category:Institutions|institutions]], which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence. | ||
***I support the | ***I support the [[Anti-Wikia Alliance]] to some extent. [[:Category:Wikia|Wikia]] should not make changes to its layout permanently without the consent of its individual Wikis. | ||
***However, I believe that people should not set up Wikis on the Wikia service for the sake of simply abandoning them and 'sporking' them on to an independent Wiki for later. | ***However, I believe that people should not set up Wikis on the Wikia service for the sake of simply [[:Category:GoalAbandoned|abandoning]] them and 'sporking' them on to an [[:Category:Ex-Wikia|independent Wiki]] for later. | ||
*I reject the irony of Wikipedia's notability criteria for deleting articles or reverting edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press. | *I reject the irony of [[English Wikipedia|Wikipedia's]] notability criteria for deleting articles or reverting edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press. | ||
**There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity. | **There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity. | ||
Revision as of 15:25, 6 May 2013
My personal philosophy on Wikis 'WikiEthics'
- Information should be free and accessible to all.
- I believe pay-to-edit Wikis are this an allusion to universities and other institutions, which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence.
- I support the Anti-Wikia Alliance to some extent. Wikia should not make changes to its layout permanently without the consent of its individual Wikis.
- However, I believe that people should not set up Wikis on the Wikia service for the sake of simply abandoning them and 'sporking' them on to an independent Wiki for later.
- I believe pay-to-edit Wikis are this an allusion to universities and other institutions, which I believe should not charge us to study. I believe they monopolize on our own intelligence.
- I reject the irony of Wikipedia's notability criteria for deleting articles or reverting edits which are not 'verifiable', yet keeping statements quoted by e.g. the local press.
- There is a slight "relative autonomy" with smaller articles, which the 'WikiTyrants' miss out, which can be a double-edge sword when it comes to validity.