User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Re:Edit summary: new section)
(→‎Re:Edit summary: move section to orignal talk page)
Line 49: Line 49:
==Why so rough?==
==Why so rough?==
It was less than a minute. Just checking in.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
It was less than a minute. Just checking in.  Best, [[MarkDilley]]
== Re:Edit summary ==
Did not know that. Will make sure to do that in the future.
[[User:Arcane|Arcane]] ([[User talk:Arcane|talk]]) 04:25, 29 May 2013 (PDT)Arcane

Revision as of 11:51, 29 May 2013

Template:TOCright

Who's Online?

Users Online: <whosonline></whosonline>

  • Articles = 22,025
  • Pages = 37,692
  • Users = 12,952
  • Admins = 17
  • Files = 4,788
  • Current User = 108.162.216.166

Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let John Stanton know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, MarkDilley

Np :) ..--Comets 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)

Request for neutral admin

Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!

We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of Conservapedia, RationalWiki, and The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, JazzMan 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)

block length

Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this WikiIndex a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at WikiIndex:Blocking Policy ? --DavidCary 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

Dispute resolution

Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is here ~~ MarkDilley

About that "dispute resolution"...

Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):

Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion

Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion

Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion

Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion

Hi Comets,

I recreated ;-) the page Christopedia in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and {{add}}. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --Wolf | talk 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)

oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--Comets 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)

Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts - best, MarkDilley

Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all

Please check out WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision and WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path, Best, MarkDilley

Yes I'm all thumbs

I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again TeraS 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT)

Why so rough?

It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, MarkDilley