Talk:Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (yes and ...) |
(revert war? just kidding) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is [[Image:StargateWikiMainPage.png]]] for me. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is [[Image:StargateWikiMainPage.png]]] for me. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-) Just kidding. We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made. Our [[Naming Conventions]] page is a bit weak at the moment. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 02:05, 4 Mar 2006 (EST) |
Revision as of 07:05, 4 March 2006
Why Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki rather than StargateWiki?
Because the page itself has a huge Welcome to Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki and that seems to match the url better than StargateWiki. Feel free to show me another way. TedErnst | talk 17:15, 3 Mar 2006 (EST)
Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is ] for me. MarkDilley | talk
I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-) Just kidding. We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made. Our Naming Conventions page is a bit weak at the moment. TedErnst | talk 02:05, 4 Mar 2006 (EST)