Proposal:Future linking: Difference between revisions

Proposal:Future linking (edit)

Revision as of 17:21, 19 November 2013

15 bytes added , 19 November 2013

m

new key for Category:Proposals: "Future Linking" using HotCat

Koavf

Bureaucrats, checkuser, interwiki, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), staff, Administrators

3,210

edits

Revision as of 15:50, 17 May 2006 (edit) TedErnst (talk \| contribs) (→‎comments: question marks) ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:21, 19 November 2013 (edit) (undo) Koavf (talk \| contribs) m (new key for Category:Proposals: "Future Linking" using HotCat) Newer edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:
	The mediawiki default for internal links to pages that don't exist is to have the text be red (I know some people also choose the option that shows them up as question marks for them, but not everyone). This is different from usemod, for example (with the question mark). If we could somehow have these external wikilinks show up as redlinks or question marks (same as internal links for that user), then I'd be in favor of this. Until then, I think it's confusing to have an external link that doesn't go to an active page and that looks the same as any other external link. [[TedErnst]] \| <small>[[User talk:TedErnst\|talk]]</small> 11:44, 17 May 2006 (EDT)		The mediawiki default for internal links to pages that don't exist is to have the text be red (I know some people also choose the option that shows them up as question marks for them, but not everyone). This is different from usemod, for example (with the question mark). If we could somehow have these external wikilinks show up as redlinks or question marks (same as internal links for that user), then I'd be in favor of this. Until then, I think it's confusing to have an external link that doesn't go to an active page and that looks the same as any other external link. [[TedErnst]] \| <small>[[User talk:TedErnst\|talk]]</small> 11:44, 17 May 2006 (EDT)

	[[Category:Proposals]]		[[Category:Proposals\|Future Linking]]