Talk:ChildWiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (Created page with "I dunno about the whole [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=ChildWiki&diff=173591&oldid=173585 "graphic" and "sexualized settings"] thing. As wikipedia:Dost_test#Criticism...") |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) (reply to Leucosticte) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I dunno about the whole [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=ChildWiki&diff=173591&oldid=173585 "graphic" and "sexualized settings"] thing. As [[wikipedia:Dost_test#Criticism|someone pointed out]], "As everything becomes child pornography in the eyes of the law—clothed children, coy children, children in settings where children are found—perhaps children themselves become pornographic". [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 23:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | I dunno about the whole [http://wikiindex.org/index.php?title=ChildWiki&diff=173591&oldid=173585 "graphic" and "sexualized settings"] thing. As [[wikipedia:Dost_test#Criticism|someone pointed out]], "As everything becomes child pornography in the eyes of the law—clothed children, coy children, children in settings where children are found—perhaps children themselves become pornographic". [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 23:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Is that edit by [[Koavf]] true and honest? If it is, then it could be considered as reasonable commentary. I, being a Brit, personally can't comment on the legalise issues of the wiki, nor the comments by Koavf - so I'm not the best person to give a worthwhile opinion. All I can say, is that based on the general content of the wiki, you are bound to attract critical opinion. [[User:Hoof Hearted|Sean, aka <small>Hoof Hearted</small>]] • <sub>[[:Category:Active administrators of this wiki|Admin]] / [[WikiIndex:Bureaucrats|'Crat]]</sub> • <small>[[User talk:Hoof Hearted|talk2HH]]</small> 23:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:14, 10 January 2014
I dunno about the whole "graphic" and "sexualized settings" thing. As someone pointed out, "As everything becomes child pornography in the eyes of the law—clothed children, coy children, children in settings where children are found—perhaps children themselves become pornographic". Leucosticte (talk) 23:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Is that edit by Koavf true and honest? If it is, then it could be considered as reasonable commentary. I, being a Brit, personally can't comment on the legalise issues of the wiki, nor the comments by Koavf - so I'm not the best person to give a worthwhile opinion. All I can say, is that based on the general content of the wiki, you are bound to attract critical opinion. Sean, aka Hoof Hearted • Admin / 'Crat • talk2HH 23:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)