Category talk:Opt out: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (re) |
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
There is no harm in keeping this category. It's true that we don't need a wiki's permission to list it. It's true that no one seems to have opted out so far. Still, that doesn't mean that we can't respect the wishes of a wiki which asks not to be listed in this index. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] ([[User talk:MarvelZuvembie|talk]]) 19:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | There is no harm in keeping this category. It's true that we don't need a wiki's permission to list it. It's true that no one seems to have opted out so far. Still, that doesn't mean that we can't respect the wishes of a wiki which asks not to be listed in this index. --[[User:MarvelZuvembie|MarvelZuvembie]] ([[User talk:MarvelZuvembie|talk]]) 19:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
: I don't think this is a bad idea. I can imagine wikis made by companies or studentgroups, who would rather not have people looking to deeply to into what there doing. For example, a Dutch wiki I tried to add of a businessgroup had a secure tag in it, that did not allow me to add them to Wikiindex. --[[User:Redgreenfourties|Redgreenfourties]] ([[User talk:Redgreenfourties|talk]]) 19:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | : I don't think this is a bad idea. I can imagine wikis made by companies or studentgroups, who would rather not have people looking to deeply to into what there doing. For example, a Dutch wiki I tried to add of a businessgroup had a secure tag in it, that did not allow me to add them to Wikiindex. --[[User:Redgreenfourties|Redgreenfourties]] ([[User talk:Redgreenfourties|talk]]) 19:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Why should we respect those companies, student groups, etc. wishes, over the wishes of those who want to look deeply into what those wikis are doing? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 19:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | ::Why should we respect those companies', student groups', etc. wishes, over the wishes of those who want to look deeply into what those wikis are doing? [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 19:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:41, 12 March 2014
There is no harm in keeping this category. It's true that we don't need a wiki's permission to list it. It's true that no one seems to have opted out so far. Still, that doesn't mean that we can't respect the wishes of a wiki which asks not to be listed in this index. --MarvelZuvembie (talk) 19:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a bad idea. I can imagine wikis made by companies or studentgroups, who would rather not have people looking to deeply to into what there doing. For example, a Dutch wiki I tried to add of a businessgroup had a secure tag in it, that did not allow me to add them to Wikiindex. --Redgreenfourties (talk) 19:09, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Why should we respect those companies', student groups', etc. wishes, over the wishes of those who want to look deeply into what those wikis are doing? Leucosticte (talk) 19:41, 12 March 2014 (UTC)