Talk:Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(revert war? just kidding) |
Hoof Hearted (talk | contribs) m (fix redirect) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is [[Image:StargateWikiMainPage.png]]] for me. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is [[Image:StargateWikiMainPage.png]]] for me. [[MarkDilley]] | <small>[[User talk:MarkDilley|talk]]</small> | ||
I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-) Just kidding. We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made. Our [[Naming | I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-) Just kidding. We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made. Our [[WikiIndex:Naming conventions]] page is a bit weak at the moment. [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 02:05, 4 Mar 2006 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 15:36, 22 August 2014
Why Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki rather than StargateWiki?
Because the page itself has a huge Welcome to Stargate SG-1 Solutions Wiki and that seems to match the url better than StargateWiki. Feel free to show me another way. TedErnst | talk 17:15, 3 Mar 2006 (EST)
Good point, I was going to argue that the huge welcome was editable, but the url is convincing. But so is 
] for me. MarkDilley | talk
I have a great idea: Let's have a revert war! :-) Just kidding. We ought to have a guideline for how naming decisions get made. Our WikiIndex:Naming conventions page is a bit weak at the moment. TedErnst | talk 02:05, 4 Mar 2006 (EST)