User talk:Comets: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (→Who's Online?: takes less space) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TOCright}} | {{TOCright}} | ||
==Who's Online? == | ==Who's Online? == | ||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} | ! Stats !! last 16 [[Special:WhosOnline|Users Online]] | ||
|- | |||
| You are logged in as:<br> | |||
'''{{CURRENTUSER}}''' | |||
*Articles = {{NUMBEROFARTICLES}} | |||
*Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}} | *Pages = {{NUMBEROFPAGES}} | ||
*Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} | *Users = {{NUMBEROFUSERS}} | ||
*Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} | *Admins = {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} | ||
*Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}} | *Files = {{NUMBEROFFILES}} | ||
|| {{:Special:WhosOnline/16}} | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let [[John Stanton]] know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, [[MarkDilley]] | ||
Revision as of 12:26, 29 September 2014
Who's Online?
| Stats | last 16 Users Online |
|---|---|
| You are logged in as: 192.168.144.2
|
There are no results for this report. |
Hello and thanks for the tip! I will let John Stanton know and he usually does the updates on a schedule, so I wouldn't be surprised if he was already planning it! :-) Glad you are here. Best, MarkDilley
- Np :) ..--Comets 06:30, 26 March 2008 (EDT)
Request for neutral admin
Hello, I'm new here, and you are the first Admin alphabetically so you win!
We need the assistance of a neutral admin to help decide the direction of Conservapedia, RationalWiki, and The Conservapedia RationalWiki war. As it stands, all three articles are being edited almost exclusively by editors of RationalWiki, a site started to criticize Conservapedia. As such, all three articles are just an extended criticism of Conservapedia. As I am associated with Conservapedia (but not exactly a huge fan), I would ask that you look over the articles and decide what, if any, criticism is acceptable according to the standards of this website. Thanks, JazzMan 15:14, 19 November 2008 (EST)
block length
Dear Comets, thank you for fighting spam and otherwise doing so much to make this WikiIndex a better place. I suspect you have more experience with blocking users than I do -- would you mind sharing your knowledge at WikiIndex:Blocking Policy ? --DavidCary 08:30, 10 July 2009 (EDT)
Dispute resolution
Hey, wanted to see if you were interested in dispute resolution, my suggestion is here ~~ MarkDilley
About that "dispute resolution"...
Hi. Sorry to bug you but we need 3 sysops to get the following articles unprotected. There is basically no one that wants them protected, as far as I can tell. We are not really sure of the purpose of this but, only that you are supposed to decide when we get to move them back out <shrug>. (Notice the statement at the top of these pages):
Talk:RationalWiki#Vote for re-insertion
Talk:A Storehouse of Knowledge#Vote for re-insertion
Talk:RationalWikiWiki#Vote for re-insertion
Talk:Liberapedia#Vote for re-insertion
Hi Comets,
I recreated ;-) the page Christopedia in a minimal way: added the wiki URL and {{add}}. It's surely not me favourite project, but it exists. Let's see what happens. Best regards --Wolf | talk 03:45, 11 November 2009 (EST)
- oh OK, its better than what was previously :P ..haha :)..--Comets 21:31, 11 November 2009 (EST)
Your thoughts on upgrade and logo
Hi - can you check out, contribute if you want - WikiIndex:Admin Notes#October 2010 Upgrade Thoughts - best, MarkDilley
Upgrade and logo stuff - open to all
Please check out WikiIndex:NewLogoDecision and WikiIndex:Spring 2011 Upgrade Path, Best, MarkDilley
Yes I'm all thumbs
I think I'll just stop for a while to be honest. Sorry again TeraS 07:30, 27 April 2011 (PDT)
Why so rough?
It was less than a minute. Just checking in. Best, MarkDilley
narrowing down the problem with email verification
I (Manorainjan ;-) assume, that Your account is email-verified. Please add the domain part of Your email to this Table of results so that we can see more clearly, which servers work and which not.