Talk:Nathan Larson for Congress: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leucosticte (talk | contribs) (re) |
Manorainjan (talk | contribs) (What consensus) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I do not see a reason why this part of wikihistory should get deleted from wikiindex.[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 12:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | I do not see a reason why this part of wikihistory should get deleted from wikiindex.[[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 12:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:It's a vanity wiki. Any wiki that (1) only has one user, and (2) is owned by the user who is adding it to WikiIndex, is by definition a vanity wiki, and its listing should be deleted as spam, per community standards established by recent consensus. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 13:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | :It's a vanity wiki. Any wiki that (1) only has one user, and (2) is owned by the user who is adding it to WikiIndex, is by definition a vanity wiki, and its listing should be deleted as spam, per community standards established by recent consensus. [[User:Leucosticte|Leucosticte]] ([[User talk:Leucosticte|talk]]) 13:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::What consensus? We reached consensus about any thing here? [[User:Manorainjan|Manorainjan]] ([[User talk:Manorainjan|talk]]) 19:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:48, 7 January 2015
I do not see a reason why this part of wikihistory should get deleted from wikiindex.Manorainjan (talk) 12:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- It's a vanity wiki. Any wiki that (1) only has one user, and (2) is owned by the user who is adding it to WikiIndex, is by definition a vanity wiki, and its listing should be deleted as spam, per community standards established by recent consensus. Leucosticte (talk) 13:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
- What consensus? We reached consensus about any thing here? Manorainjan (talk) 19:48, 7 January 2015 (UTC)