WikiIndex talk:File deletion policy: Difference between revisions

(→‎Obscenety: what is it?)
Line 3: Line 3:
[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 13:17, 10 August 2015 (PDT)
[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 13:17, 10 August 2015 (PDT)


== Obscenety ==
== Obscenity ==


The depiction of nudity is in itself not obscene, otherwise the human being would be obscene it itself.  
The depiction of nudity is in itself not obscene, otherwise the human being would be obscene it itself.  
Line 13: Line 13:
These are euphemisms and circumlocutions. But circumlocutions have no place at all in an explanation of a definition or policy. Whereas ''full frontal'' is an euphemism as well however well known this term may be, commonly used in [[Boobpedia]].
These are euphemisms and circumlocutions. But circumlocutions have no place at all in an explanation of a definition or policy. Whereas ''full frontal'' is an euphemism as well however well known this term may be, commonly used in [[Boobpedia]].
I think that the term "patently offensive" even though very subjective, would be a better part of the definition. Is it meant to arouse? (Anger, fright, lust...). As such anything humorous would be not part of the definition, which should also be mentioned. --[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:09, 15 August 2015 (PDT)
I think that the term "patently offensive" even though very subjective, would be a better part of the definition. Is it meant to arouse? (Anger, fright, lust...). As such anything humorous would be not part of the definition, which should also be mentioned. --[[User_talk:Manorainjan|'''<span style="color: orange;">Manorainjan</span>''']] 01:09, 15 August 2015 (PDT)
:'''Definitions''' Your suggestion is to take one phrase with "no real definition" and replace it with another? [[User:Koavf|Koavf]] ([[User talk:Koavf|talk]]) 07:39, 15 August 2015 (PDT)
3,210

edits