Template talk:Wikitravel: Difference between revisions

From WikiIndex
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Hoof Hearted moved page Talk:Wikitravel (en) to Category talk:Wikitravel without leaving a redirect: the discussion refers to all language versions)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{TOCright}}
==Untitled==
==Untitled==
"Wikitravel" (lowercase t) is the preferred spelling. --[[User:Evan Prodromou|Evan Prodromou]] 15:36, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)
"Wikitravel" (lowercase t) is the preferred spelling. --[[User:Evan Prodromou|Evan Prodromou]] 15:36, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)


== Picture ==
==Picture==
 
Wikitravel recently got a new logo. - [[User:Patricksheridan|Patricksheridan]] 6:22pm March 26, 2006 (EST)
Wikitravel recently got a new logo. - [[User:Patricksheridan|Patricksheridan]] 6:22pm March 26, 2006 (EST)


== multilingual ==
==multilingual==
 
I'd like to make a <tt>{{Template|Wikitravel}}</tt> similar to [[:template:Wikipedia]] and [[:template:Wiktionary]] that lists our pages for each of the languages.  [[Wikitravel (German)]] will have to change names to something like 'Deutch Wikitravel' and the others added.  Does this seem like a good idea? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:14, 26 May 2006 (EDT)
I'd like to make a <nowiki>{{wikitravel}}</nowiki> similar to [[:template:wikipedia]] and [[:template:wiktionary]] that lists our pages for each of the languages.  [[Wikitravel (German)]] will have to change names to something like [[Deutch Wikitravel]] and the others added.  Does this seem like a good idea? [[TedErnst]] | <small>[[User talk:TedErnst|talk]]</small> 13:14, 26 May 2006 (EDT)
: I think that is along the lines of the authentic lamguage proposal we have been discussing, i.e. good idea. [[MarkDilley]]
: I think that is along the lines of the authentic lamguage proposal we have been discussing, i.e. good idea. [[MarkDilley]]


== Not to be pedantic, but... ==
==Not to be pedantic, but...==
Why is this page categorized with [[Wikimedia Foundation]] - which AFAIK doesn't run Wikitravel? --[[User:Morten Blaabjerg|Morten Blaabjerg]] 20:26, 24 August 2006 (EDT)
Why is this page categorized with [[:Category:Wikimedia Foundation|Wikimedia Foundation]] - which AFAIK doesn't run Wikitravel? --[[User:Morten Blaabjerg|Morten Blaabjerg]] 20:26, 24 August 2006 (EDT)


PS. Aha... Maybe this has something to do with a template being used on this page? Categories and templates used in conjunction can sometimes be treacherous. I would suggest removing this category from [[:Template:Wikitravel]], as it is misleading. I would do it myself, but as I doesn't get if there's a purpose for it, I post here instead. --[[User:Morten Blaabjerg|Morten Blaabjerg]] 20:34, 24 August 2006 (EDT)
:PS. Aha... Maybe this has something to do with a template being used on this page? Categories and templates used in conjunction can sometimes be treacherous. I would suggest removing this category from [[Template:Wikitravel]], as it is misleading. I would do it myself, but as I doesn't get if there's a purpose for it, I post here instead. --[[User:Morten Blaabjerg|Morten Blaabjerg]] 20:34, 24 August 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:47, 20 June 2021

Template:TOCright

Untitled

"Wikitravel" (lowercase t) is the preferred spelling. --Evan Prodromou 15:36, 26 Jan 2006 (EST)

Picture

Wikitravel recently got a new logo. - Patricksheridan 6:22pm March 26, 2006 (EST)

multilingual

I'd like to make a {{Wikitravel}} similar to template:Wikipedia and template:Wiktionary that lists our pages for each of the languages. Wikitravel (German) will have to change names to something like 'Deutch Wikitravel' and the others added. Does this seem like a good idea? TedErnst | talk 13:14, 26 May 2006 (EDT)

I think that is along the lines of the authentic lamguage proposal we have been discussing, i.e. good idea. MarkDilley

Not to be pedantic, but...

Why is this page categorized with Wikimedia Foundation - which AFAIK doesn't run Wikitravel? --Morten Blaabjerg 20:26, 24 August 2006 (EDT)

PS. Aha... Maybe this has something to do with a template being used on this page? Categories and templates used in conjunction can sometimes be treacherous. I would suggest removing this category from Template:Wikitravel, as it is misleading. I would do it myself, but as I doesn't get if there's a purpose for it, I post here instead. --Morten Blaabjerg 20:34, 24 August 2006 (EDT)