Category talk:Blog: Difference between revisions

Category talk:Blog (edit)

Revision as of 20:30, 17 May 2006

372 bytes added , 17 May 2006

are you okay using both?

TedErnst

6,456

edits

Revision as of 16:30, 17 May 2006 (edit) MarkDilley (talk \| contribs) (nevermind) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:30, 17 May 2006 (edit) (undo) TedErnst (talk \| contribs) (are you okay using both?) Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Okay, I've gone back and put the blog tag or category back on the ones you took off. I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for taking tags off a page. Sure, if there's a ''barbie'' tag on a surfing wiki, fine, take it off. But if it's a term that does apply to that wiki, I'm not why removing info is a good idea. Adding more tags with your preferred term seems '''very''' appropriate, by the way. [[TedErnst]] \| <small>[[User talk:TedErnst\|talk]]</small> 11:22, 17 May 2006 (EDT)		: Okay, I've gone back and put the blog tag or category back on the ones you took off. I'm not sure I understand the reasoning for taking tags off a page. Sure, if there's a ''barbie'' tag on a surfing wiki, fine, take it off. But if it's a term that does apply to that wiki, I'm not why removing info is a good idea. Adding more tags with your preferred term seems '''very''' appropriate, by the way. [[TedErnst]] \| <small>[[User talk:TedErnst\|talk]]</small> 11:22, 17 May 2006 (EDT)

			: We can have '''both''' tags on any of these pages. That way people that like to use the word "weblog" will be happy and be able to find the wikis they want and the people that use the word "blog" will be similarly happy and be able to find the wikis they want. Is this okay with you? [[TedErnst]] \| <small>[[User talk:TedErnst\|talk]]</small> 16:30, 17 May 2006 (EDT)