Talk:CommunityWiki: Difference between revisions
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (kooky) |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) (I get it now.) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Well it is kooky in terms of how you had done disambigous pages prior, that is all. For example, the wiki's are named differently, one is [[Community Wiki]] and the other is [[CommunityWiki]] - not much differnece, granted, but difference. Maybe not an issue. ;-) [[MarkDilley]] | Well it is kooky in terms of how you had done disambigous pages prior, that is all. For example, the wiki's are named differently, one is [[Community Wiki]] and the other is [[CommunityWiki]] - not much differnece, granted, but difference. Maybe not an issue. ;-) [[MarkDilley]] | ||
Ok, I see now how you did it. templats.... hmmmm.... looks good, hard to edit, I understand your previous point now. [[MarkDilley]] | |||
Revision as of 20:49, 3 July 2006
transclusion test
Mark, I really like this idea. I have modified it to use transclusion so that each wiki still has it's own page that can be linked to individually. One problem I see with that is that it's not all that easy to see *how* to edit either of these individually. Maybe we need a link somewhere? TedErnst | talk 12:41, 3 July 2006 (EDT)
Fantastico Ted!!! This looks great. I see your point about how to edit. Maybe we have a disambiguous statement at the top that points directly to each section? Not sure, but I like the direction! Great!!! The other thing that is a little kooky still are the titles... need to think about that..MarkDilley
Titles? One this page, the structured data shows both with the name "CommunityWiki". What's kooky? TedErnst | talk 16:22, 3 July 2006 (EDT)
Well it is kooky in terms of how you had done disambigous pages prior, that is all. For example, the wiki's are named differently, one is Community Wiki and the other is CommunityWiki - not much differnece, granted, but difference. Maybe not an issue. ;-) MarkDilley
Ok, I see now how you did it. templats.... hmmmm.... looks good, hard to edit, I understand your previous point now. MarkDilley