Collaboration at work: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
MarkDilley (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WeblogPost}} | {{ | ||
|SourceLink = http://blog.wirearchy.com/blog/_archives/2006/6/27/2060712.html | |||
|SourceName = Wirearchy | |||
|WeblogPost = http://recentchanges.info/?p=88 | |||
}} | |||
''27-Jun-2006'' | ''27-Jun-2006'' | ||
Wirearchy quotes CNET News.com's Martin LaMonica's story about collaboration and wikis: | |||
: ''"This way of capturing collaborative wisdom, collective knowledge is a different take on knowledge management, | : ''"This way of capturing collaborative wisdom, collective knowledge is a different take on '''knowledge management, which was fundamentally flawed'''" (said IBM Lotus Division general manager Michael Rhodin). | ||
== Additional references== | |||
* http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6087566.html | |||
[[Category:WeblogArchive]] | |||
Revision as of 07:22, 25 August 2006
{{ |SourceLink = http://blog.wirearchy.com/blog/_archives/2006/6/27/2060712.html |SourceName = Wirearchy |WeblogPost = http://recentchanges.info/?p=88 }} 27-Jun-2006
Wirearchy quotes CNET News.com's Martin LaMonica's story about collaboration and wikis:
- "This way of capturing collaborative wisdom, collective knowledge is a different take on knowledge management, which was fundamentally flawed" (said IBM Lotus Division general manager Michael Rhodin).